12.12.2012 Views

Who Needs Emotions? The Brain Meets the Robot

Who Needs Emotions? The Brain Meets the Robot

Who Needs Emotions? The Brain Meets the Robot

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

352 conclusions<br />

to <strong>the</strong> prefrontal cortex, which can <strong>the</strong>n, on <strong>the</strong> basis of <strong>the</strong> current goals of<br />

<strong>the</strong> organism and <strong>the</strong> recognition of <strong>the</strong> nature of <strong>the</strong> object, bias <strong>the</strong> AIP to<br />

choose <strong>the</strong> affordance appropriate to <strong>the</strong> task at hand. Figure 12.1 gives only<br />

a partial view of <strong>the</strong> FARS model, which also provides mechanisms for sequencing<br />

actions. It segregates <strong>the</strong> F5 circuitry, which encodes unit actions<br />

from <strong>the</strong> circuitry encoding a sequence, possibly <strong>the</strong> part of <strong>the</strong> supplementary<br />

motor area called “pre-SMA” (Rizzolatti, Luppino, & Matelli, 1998).<br />

<strong>The</strong> administration of <strong>the</strong> sequence (inhibiting extraneous actions, while<br />

priming imminent actions) is <strong>the</strong>n carried out by <strong>the</strong> basal ganglia (Bischoff-<br />

Gre<strong>the</strong>, Crowley, & Arbib, 2003).<br />

Bringing in <strong>the</strong> Mirror System<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r study revealed a class of F5 neurons that discharged not only when<br />

<strong>the</strong> monkey grasped or manipulated objects but also when <strong>the</strong> monkey observed<br />

<strong>the</strong> experimenter make a gesture similar to <strong>the</strong> one that, when actively<br />

performed by <strong>the</strong> monkey, involved activity of <strong>the</strong> neuron (Rizzolatti,<br />

Fadiga, Gallese, & Fogassi, 1995). Neurons with this property are called<br />

“mirror neurons.” <strong>The</strong> majority of mirror neurons are selective for one type<br />

of action, and for almost all mirror neurons <strong>the</strong>re is a link between <strong>the</strong> effective<br />

observed movement and <strong>the</strong> effective executed movement.<br />

Two positron emission tomography (PET) experiments (Rizzolatti<br />

et al., 1996; Grafton, Arbib, Fadiga, & Rizzolatti, 1996) were <strong>the</strong>n designed<br />

to seek mirror systems for grasping in humans. Grasp observation significantly<br />

activated <strong>the</strong> superior temporal sulcus (STS), <strong>the</strong> inferior parietal<br />

lobule, and <strong>the</strong> inferior frontal gyrus (area 45). All activations were in <strong>the</strong><br />

left hemisphere. <strong>The</strong> last area is of especial interest—areas 44 and 45 in <strong>the</strong><br />

left hemisphere of <strong>the</strong> human brain constitute Broca’s area, a major component<br />

of <strong>the</strong> language mechanisms. Indeed, F5 is generally considered to be<br />

<strong>the</strong> homolog of Broca’s area.<br />

And on to Language<br />

<strong>The</strong> finding that human Broca’s area contains a mirror system for grasping<br />

led us (Arbib & Rizzolatti, 1997; Rizzolatti and Arbib, 1998) to explore <strong>the</strong><br />

hypo<strong>the</strong>sis that <strong>the</strong> mirror system provided <strong>the</strong> basis for <strong>the</strong> evolution of<br />

human language via seven stages:<br />

1. Grasping.<br />

2. A mirror system for grasping.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!