12.12.2012 Views

Who Needs Emotions? The Brain Meets the Robot

Who Needs Emotions? The Brain Meets the Robot

Who Needs Emotions? The Brain Meets the Robot

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

260 robots<br />

Mean distance to attachment object<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

-1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0<br />

Comfort level<br />

No Attachment Behavior<br />

With Attachment Behavior<br />

Figure 9.6. (Top) Nomad robot conducting 5-minute explorations. <strong>The</strong> object<br />

of attachment is <strong>the</strong> tree. (Bottom) Results showing how average distance<br />

from attachment object increases as robot’s comfort level increases.<br />

in Breazeal’s Chapter 10). Takanishi’s (1999) approach is also used to reduce<br />

<strong>the</strong> overall internal state space into three dimensions: pleasantness,<br />

arousal, and confidence. <strong>The</strong> six basic emotional states are located within<br />

this three-dimensional space. By establishing predefined levels of internal<br />

variables, such as hunger and thirst, and determining how <strong>the</strong> current state<br />

of <strong>the</strong> robot relates to those thresholds, pleasantness can be assessed. If <strong>the</strong>se<br />

variables remain within <strong>the</strong> regulated range, <strong>the</strong> pleasantness is high. Arousal<br />

is controlled by both circadian rhythm and unexpected stimuli, while confidence<br />

is determined by <strong>the</strong> certainty of recognized external stimuli.<br />

<strong>The</strong> resulting emotional values affect <strong>the</strong> action-selection process for<br />

behavior eligibility for execution. Drawing on aspects of both McFarland’s

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!