12.12.2012 Views

Who Needs Emotions? The Brain Meets the Robot

Who Needs Emotions? The Brain Meets the Robot

Who Needs Emotions? The Brain Meets the Robot

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

organization of motivational–emotional systems 55<br />

Walker, Brooks, & Holden-Dye, 1996). One study showed a 70% homology<br />

between cloned Drosophila D 1/D 5 receptors and <strong>the</strong>ir human counterpart<br />

as well as stimulation of cAMP production by DA (Gotzes, Balfanz, &<br />

Baumann, 1994). Although <strong>the</strong> functional role of DA has not been examined<br />

in lower species as extensively as in vertebrates, <strong>the</strong>re is certainly some<br />

evidence that it may influence cellular function, adaptive behaviors, and<br />

possibly plasticity in many animals. In Drosophila, <strong>the</strong> DA system appears<br />

to regulate development, feeding, sexual behavior, and possibly learning<br />

(Neckameyer, 1996, 1998; Tempel, Livingstone, & Quinn, 1984; Yellman,<br />

Tao, He, & Hirsh, 1997). In honeybees, DA receptors have been well characterized<br />

and proposed to play a role in motor behavior (Blenau & Baumann,<br />

2001; Kokay & Mercer, 1996). Menzel and colleagues (1999) have used classical<br />

conditioning in <strong>the</strong> honeybee to demonstrate a potential analogue for a<br />

DA role in reward learning. Appetitive conditioning to sucrose (olfactory<br />

conditioning to <strong>the</strong> proboscis extension reflex) is impaired with depletion<br />

of biogenic amines and restored by DA. Fur<strong>the</strong>r studies of reward learning<br />

have shown that a neuron, termed VUMmx1, shows similar “reward prediction”<br />

properties to <strong>the</strong> mammalian homologue (Menzel, 2001). In Aplysia,<br />

DA appears to be a transmitter in a central pattern generator important for<br />

feeding (Kabotyanski, Baxter, Cushman, & Byrne, 2000; Diaz-Rios, Oyola,<br />

& Miller, 2002), and recent investigations show that dopaminergic synapses<br />

mediate neuronal changes during operant conditioning of <strong>the</strong> buccal reflex<br />

(Nargeot, Baxter, Patterson, & Byrne, 1999; Brembs et al., 2002). <strong>The</strong>se<br />

examples suggest that throughout evolutionary development of species DA<br />

has retained a role of reward–motor coupling. Its expanded capacity to<br />

modulate and modify <strong>the</strong> activity of cortical networks involved in cognition,<br />

motor planning, and reward expectation is apparent in mammalian species.<br />

Serotonin: Aggression and Depression<br />

A fur<strong>the</strong>r example of monoamine modulation of motivated behaviors and<br />

affective processing is <strong>the</strong> serotonergic system. Serotonin (5-HT), an indoleamine<br />

syn<strong>the</strong>sized from <strong>the</strong> amino acid tryptophan, has been widely implicated<br />

in many behavioral functions, including behavioral state regulation and<br />

arousal, motor pattern generation, sleep, learning and plasticity, food intake,<br />

mood, and social behavior. In terms of anatomy in <strong>the</strong> mammalian brain,<br />

serotonergic systems are widespread; <strong>the</strong>ir cell bodies reside in midbrain<br />

and pontine regions, and <strong>the</strong>re are extensive descending and ascending projections.<br />

Descending projections reach brain-stem and spinal motor and<br />

sensory regions, while <strong>the</strong> ascending inputs project to widespread regions in<br />

<strong>the</strong> cortex, limbic system, basal ganglia, and hypothalamus—indeed, <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!