12.12.2012 Views

Who Needs Emotions? The Brain Meets the Robot

Who Needs Emotions? The Brain Meets the Robot

Who Needs Emotions? The Brain Meets the Robot

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

obot emotion 305<br />

tization of goals. <strong>The</strong> fear response accomplishes this by effectively “hijacking”<br />

<strong>the</strong> behavior and motor systems to rapidly respond to <strong>the</strong> situation. For<br />

instance, <strong>the</strong> fear response may evoke Kismet’s escape behavior, causing <strong>the</strong><br />

robot to close its eyes and turn its head away from <strong>the</strong> offending stimulus.<br />

Affective Drive Influences<br />

In addition, affective signals arising from <strong>the</strong> drives bias which behaviors<br />

become active to satiate a particular motive. <strong>The</strong>se affective influences contribute<br />

to activating behaviors that are <strong>the</strong> most relevant to <strong>the</strong> robot’s<br />

“health”-related needs. When <strong>the</strong> drives are reasonably well satiated, <strong>the</strong><br />

perceptual contributions play <strong>the</strong> dominant role in determining which goals<br />

to pursue. Hence, <strong>the</strong> presence of a person will tend to elicit social behaviors<br />

and <strong>the</strong> presence of a toy will tend to elicit toy-directed behaviors. As a<br />

result, Kismet’s behavior appears strongly opportunistic, taking advantage<br />

of whatever stimulus presents itself.<br />

However, if a particular drive is not satiated for a while, its influence on<br />

behavior selection will grow in intensity. When this occurs, <strong>the</strong> robot becomes<br />

less opportunistic and grows more persistent about pursing those goals<br />

that are relevant to that particular drive. For instance, <strong>the</strong> robot’s behavior<br />

becomes more “finicky” as it grows more prone to give a disgust response to<br />

stimuli that do not satiate that specific drive. <strong>The</strong> robot will also start to<br />

exhibit a stronger-looking preference to stimuli that satiate that drive over<br />

those that do not. <strong>The</strong>se aspects of persistent behavior continue until <strong>the</strong><br />

drive is reasonably satiated again.<br />

Affective Behavior Influences<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r class of affective responses influences arbitration between competing<br />

behavioral strategies to achieve <strong>the</strong> same goal. Delayed progress of a<br />

particular behavior results in a state of growing frustration, reflected by a<br />

stern expression on <strong>the</strong> robot’s face. As Kismet grows more frustrated, it<br />

lowers <strong>the</strong> activation level of <strong>the</strong> active behavior within <strong>the</strong> behavior group.<br />

This makes it more likely to switch to ano<strong>the</strong>r behavior within <strong>the</strong> same<br />

group, which could have a greater chance of achieving <strong>the</strong> current goal.<br />

For instance, if Kismet’s goal is to socialize with a person, it will try to<br />

get a person to interact with it in a suitable manner (e.g., arousing but not<br />

too aggressive). If <strong>the</strong> perceptual system detects <strong>the</strong> presence of a person<br />

but <strong>the</strong> person is ignoring Kismet, <strong>the</strong> robot will engage in behaviors to attract<br />

<strong>the</strong> person’s attention. For instance, <strong>the</strong> robot’s initial strategy might

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!