02.01.2015 Views

Antibiotikaprofylax vid kirurgiska ingrepp - SBU

Antibiotikaprofylax vid kirurgiska ingrepp - SBU

Antibiotikaprofylax vid kirurgiska ingrepp - SBU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 4.1.12 Hernia repair.<br />

Author<br />

Year<br />

Reference<br />

Country<br />

Study<br />

design<br />

Population<br />

characteristics<br />

Intervention<br />

Method<br />

Number indi<strong>vid</strong>uals<br />

Control<br />

Number<br />

indi<strong>vid</strong>uals<br />

Results<br />

Withdrawal<br />

Drop outs<br />

Study quality<br />

and relevance<br />

Comments<br />

Abramov<br />

1996<br />

[60]<br />

Israel<br />

RCT<br />

To evaluate wound<br />

infection in umbilical<br />

and incisional hernia.<br />

Mesh-technique post-op.<br />

n=41<br />

Follow-up 3 weeks<br />

I: Cefonicid 1 g iv 30 min<br />

before operation<br />

C: Placebo SSI<br />

I: 1/17 (6%)<br />

C: 8/18 (44%)<br />

OR 0.08 (95%<br />

CI 0.08–0.72)<br />

7 protocol<br />

violation<br />

Moderate<br />

Too few pts. Only study<br />

available. Ab can be recommended<br />

Aufenacker<br />

2004<br />

[70]<br />

The Netherlands<br />

RCT<br />

Multicenter<br />

Ab prophylaxis in elective<br />

hernia prosthetic repair.<br />

Double blind. Computerbased<br />

randomisation.<br />

Standardised supervised<br />

operation. Defined SSI.<br />

Power calculation.<br />

1 040 pts allocated<br />

to compensate for<br />

drop outs.<br />

n=978<br />

Follow-up 12 weeks<br />

I: Cefuroxime 1 500 mg iv<br />

at induction of anesthesia<br />

(n=503)<br />

C: Placebo<br />

(n=505)<br />

SSI<br />

I: 8/503 (1.6%)<br />

C: 9/505 (1.8%)<br />

NNT 520 pts<br />

25 no<br />

consent,<br />

not operated.<br />

19 protocol<br />

violation<br />

High<br />

No benefit. Risk factors<br />

for infection: female,<br />

>60 years, bilateral hernia.<br />

Low infection rate. Problem:<br />

optimal timing of administration<br />

of ab. In metaanalysis<br />

[3,57]<br />

Aufenacker<br />

2006<br />

[3]<br />

The Netherlands<br />

Metaanalysis<br />

To determine whether<br />

systemic antibiotic prophylaxis<br />

prevented wound<br />

infection after repair of<br />

abdominal wall hernia<br />

with mesh, 1966–2005.<br />

8 out of 26 potentially<br />

relevant studies.<br />

n=2 507<br />

Ab cefonicid 1 g,<br />

cefuroxime 1.5 g,<br />

cefazolin 2 g,<br />

ampicillin +<br />

sulbactan 1.5 g,<br />

ampicillin + clavulanic<br />

acid 2 g (n=1 230)<br />

C: Placebo<br />

(n=1 277)<br />

Superficial infection<br />

I: 18/1 230 (1.5%)<br />

C: 38/1 277 (3.0%)<br />

OR 0.54, NNT 74<br />

Deep infection<br />

I: 0.3%<br />

C: 0.6%<br />

OR 0.50, NNT 401<br />

High<br />

One study only with umbilical<br />

and incisional repair.<br />

No difference between<br />

groups, but study only<br />

moderate quality. Antibiotic<br />

prophylaxis did not prevent<br />

the occurrence of wound<br />

infection after groin hernia<br />

surgery and should not be<br />

used. Exception in pts with<br />

high risk eg long operations<br />

>60 min and depressed<br />

immune function<br />

The table continues on the next page<br />

134 antibiotikaprofylax <strong>vid</strong> <strong>kirurgiska</strong> <strong>ingrepp</strong> KAPITEL 4 • den systematiska litteraturöversikten<br />

135

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!