02.01.2015 Views

Antibiotikaprofylax vid kirurgiska ingrepp - SBU

Antibiotikaprofylax vid kirurgiska ingrepp - SBU

Antibiotikaprofylax vid kirurgiska ingrepp - SBU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 4.6.2 Skin surgery.<br />

Author<br />

Year<br />

Reference<br />

Country<br />

Study<br />

design<br />

Population<br />

characteristics<br />

Intervention<br />

Method<br />

Number indi<strong>vid</strong>uals<br />

Control<br />

Number<br />

indi<strong>vid</strong>uals<br />

Results<br />

Withdrawal<br />

Drop outs<br />

Study quality<br />

and relevance<br />

Comments<br />

Bencini<br />

1991<br />

[4]<br />

Italy<br />

RCT<br />

One unit performed skinsurgery<br />

(benign/malign),<br />

whole body. Tumour<br />

diameter 19–20 mm.<br />

Comparable groups.<br />

Standardised surgical<br />

technique<br />

n=2 165 (1 330 female/<br />

835 male)<br />

Follow-up 1 month post-op<br />

I1: Cephalozin 1 g x 2 im<br />

post-op for 3 days (n=542;<br />

209 female/333 male)<br />

I2: Cephalozin powder<br />

in open wound (n=540;<br />

208 female/332 male)<br />

I3: Cephalozin 1 g x 2 im<br />

for 2 days pre-op and<br />

2 days post-op (n=541;<br />

209 female/332 male)<br />

C: No antibiotics<br />

(541 pts; 332<br />

male/209 female)<br />

Wound infection<br />

I1: 8/542 (1.5%)<br />

I2: 4/536 (0.9%)<br />

I3: 1/541 (0.2%)<br />

C: 23/541 (4.3%)<br />

I1 vs C p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!