09.10.2013 Views

Witti-Buch2 2001.qxd - Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society

Witti-Buch2 2001.qxd - Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society

Witti-Buch2 2001.qxd - Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Logic vs. Information - Two Approaches To Language<br />

problem mathematically even if we lose some aspects of system characteristics. System<br />

theory gives us a tool to handle such reductions in a systematic way. We can discuss<br />

validity of a given reduction and idealisations made to obtain it. We can also discuss<br />

different reductions as complementary hoping that in whole they enable us to examine<br />

the system thoroughly.<br />

Reduction of language to its information content shall be of our interest in the next<br />

part of the paper.<br />

3. Language as a means of information exchange<br />

The system approach to language study gives the framework to treat the language as a<br />

means of information exchange, thus allowing for establishing usefulness as a value.<br />

Such value can be required for any spoken or written sentence. Usefulness is always<br />

relative to a cognitive subject on one side and to a particular purpose on the other.<br />

While relation to the cognitive subject is generally seen as the domain of psychology,<br />

relation to the purpose can be examined independently of psychological aspect. At least,<br />

provided that some intuitive assumptions are given.<br />

Concerning our knowledge the following assumption seems to be implicitly accepted<br />

by all philosophers: the purpose of our knowledge is cognition of the world around us.<br />

From that point, any information helping us to understand the world is useful, while<br />

meaningless or contradictory statements are not, in themselves, the subjects of our<br />

interest. This does not mean they do not carry any information, though such information<br />

has contextual value. Usefulness of scientific statements was so important for some<br />

philosophers, e.g. W. James, that they tried to suggest the replacement of the concept<br />

of truth by the concept of usefulness as the criterion of acceptance. In one aspect such<br />

postulate is justified: cognitive subjects, like human beings, need efficient knowledge to<br />

survive. Natural selection therefore prefers usefulness to truth.<br />

4. Sentence “filtering” in natural language<br />

Before a sentence gets accepted as a part of our knowledge, it is filtered through a<br />

“logical value filter”. Only true sentences, whatever the notion of truth is, can contribute<br />

what we know. In natural languages there is, however, another criterion, which selects<br />

the candidates before we try to establish the truth or falsehood of a sentence. Let us call<br />

it “information filtering”.<br />

177

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!