09.10.2013 Views

Witti-Buch2 2001.qxd - Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society

Witti-Buch2 2001.qxd - Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society

Witti-Buch2 2001.qxd - Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Net Metaphor Reconsidered: <strong>Wittgenstein</strong>'s<br />

Conception of Science in the Tractatus<br />

Remko van der Geest<br />

There can be no doubt that the physicists Heinrich Hertz and <strong>Ludwig</strong> Boltzmann exerted<br />

an influence on the young <strong>Wittgenstein</strong>. Both their names were mentioned by<br />

<strong>Wittgenstein</strong> in 1931 in a revealing passage of his notebook in which he reflected about<br />

his own original philosophical contributions:<br />

There is truth in my idea that really in my thinking I am only reproductive. I<br />

believe that I have never invented a new line of thought: that has always been<br />

given me by someone else. I have only seized on it immediately with a<br />

passionate urge for the work of clarification. That is how Boltzmann, Hertz,<br />

Schopenhauer, Frege, Russell, Kraus, Loos, Weininger, Spengler, Sraffa<br />

influenced me. (McGuinness 1988, 84)<br />

According to Brian McGuinness (1979, 36) <strong>Wittgenstein</strong> presumably listed these<br />

names "in the order in which their influence was exerted". If this is right, Boltzmann was<br />

the first to have an important influence on <strong>Wittgenstein</strong>'s thought.<br />

It is known that <strong>Wittgenstein</strong> possessed a copy of Boltzmann's Populäre Schriften.<br />

He bought and read this work soon after it was published in 1905 (Nedo et al. 1983, 63).<br />

He also intended to study under Boltzmann at the University of Vienna in the fall of 1906,<br />

a wish that was frustrated by Boltzmann's suicide in the very same year.<br />

Boltzmann's influence on <strong>Wittgenstein</strong> is usually construed by pointing out some<br />

parallels between Boltzmann's rather rudimentary thoughts about language and<br />

<strong>Wittgenstein</strong>'s philosophy of language (e.g. Wilson 1989). However, to the best of my<br />

knowledge no one has yet investigated Boltzmann's influence on <strong>Wittgenstein</strong>'s<br />

conception of science in the Tractatus. Hertz is commonly considered to be the only one<br />

who has shaped <strong>Wittgenstein</strong>'s Tractarian views of science. This, I hold, does not suffice<br />

for an exhaustive account of, in particular, <strong>Wittgenstein</strong>'s net metaphor. In the sequel I<br />

will offer a deeper understanding of the net metaphor by taking Boltzmann's influence<br />

into account as well.<br />

The net metaphor appears in <strong>Wittgenstein</strong>'s Notebooks for the first time in a section<br />

dating from December 6th 1914. These passages constitute the largest and central part<br />

of the net metaphor and reappear almost entirely in the Tractatus as the theses 6.341,<br />

342

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!