09.10.2013 Views

Witti-Buch2 2001.qxd - Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society

Witti-Buch2 2001.qxd - Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society

Witti-Buch2 2001.qxd - Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Jimmy Plourde<br />

References<br />

Bradley, R. (1992), The Nature of All Being: A Study of <strong>Wittgenstein</strong>’s Modal Atomism.<br />

Oxford: Oxford University Press.<br />

Carruthers, P. (1989), Tractarian Semantics. Finding Sense in <strong>Wittgenstein</strong>’s Tractatus,<br />

Oxford: Basil Blackwell.<br />

Plourde, J. (2000), “Ontologie der Modalitäten im Tractatus”, Metaphysica, Sonderheft<br />

1, 19-40.<br />

Simons, P.M. (1992), “The Old Problem of Complex and Fact”, in Philosophy and<br />

Logic in Central Europe from Bolzano to Tarski. Selected Essays, Dordrecht:<br />

Kluwer, 319-338. (originally published in Teoria 2, 1985, 205-225).<br />

Stenius, E. (1960), <strong>Wittgenstein</strong>’s Tractatus: A critical exposition of the main lines of<br />

Thought. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.<br />

<strong>Wittgenstein</strong>, L. (1979), Notebooks 1914-1916, ed. by G.H. von Wright & G.E.M<br />

Anscombe, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.<br />

—, (1989), Tractatus Logico-philosophicus, hgb von B. McGuiness und J. Schulte,<br />

Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.<br />

Wright, G.H. von (1972), “Some observations on Modal Logic and Philosophical<br />

Systems”, in Contemporary Philosophy in Scandinavia, Baltimore: J. Hopkins<br />

University Press,17-26.<br />

—, (1982), “Modal Logic and the Tractatus” in <strong>Wittgenstein</strong>, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.<br />

Endnote<br />

1 As to Carruthers, we find evidence that he agrred with theses (i) and (ii) in his book<br />

on the semantics of the Tractatus where he writes “the situation represented by a<br />

proposition (the Sinn) may not actually exist in the world, because the prop may be<br />

false” (P. Carruthers, 1989, p. 25). Stenius has an interpretation of the nature of the<br />

relations that subsist between the proposition as a picture and reality which may be<br />

considered as even stronger as the one set out in the reasoning and to which<br />

Simons view comes very close to. According to Stenius, a false proposition not<br />

merely represents a state of affairs but depicts it (er bildet ihn ab): “If the picture is<br />

true, however, it not only represents the prototype, but also depicts it. But if it is<br />

false, it does not depict the prototype, but depicts a possible state of affairs other<br />

than the real one. (E. Stenius, 1960, p. 98)”.<br />

2 On this, see my 2000.<br />

192

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!