28.02.2014 Views

Molecular beam epitaxial growth of III-V semiconductor ... - KOBRA

Molecular beam epitaxial growth of III-V semiconductor ... - KOBRA

Molecular beam epitaxial growth of III-V semiconductor ... - KOBRA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5.5 Self-Assembled InGaAs QDs Embedded in Si Matrix<br />

is driven by the thermal mismatch in Si/InAs system. At the end <strong>of</strong> the <strong>growth</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> QDs the system experience nearly local equilibrium state, with mist strain<br />

relieved totally by MD array. However, during cooling down the substrate temperature<br />

to the room temperature and due to the thermal mismatch, InAs will<br />

shrink faster than Si by keeping constant structure volume. Therefore, introduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> thermal stress during cooling down to room temperature resulted in extra<br />

mist dislocations generation. Similar strain analysis done for samples with 1<br />

and 2 MLs InAs QDs coverage and showed almost same observations as 4 MLs<br />

InAs sample. As a conclusion from strain study, a fully relaxed InAs QDs formation<br />

has been observed and mostly with semi-coherent dots formation. However,<br />

the lattice strain relaxation is released by dislocation loops localized along the<br />

InAs/Si interface consisting <strong>of</strong> perfect 60 ◦ -type dislocations. The thermal stress<br />

is released by SFs and MTs generation during cool down process, which have been<br />

observed in some cases.<br />

5.5 Self-Assembled InGaAs QDs Embedded in Si<br />

Matrix<br />

In order to reduce the lattice mismatch between <strong>III</strong>-V quantum dots and silicon,<br />

indium concentration in In x Ga 1−x As QDs was reduced to 50 %. The lattice mismatch<br />

is measured by the mist parameter (f) dened by Eq. 5.13. However, the<br />

mist parameter (f ) is a function <strong>of</strong> the alloy composition (x) in ternary <strong>semiconductor</strong><br />

compounds like In x Ga 1−x As [90]. The lattice constant <strong>of</strong> In x Ga 1−x As can<br />

be obtained by Eq. 5.14. Therefore, for 50 % indium composition the lattice constant<br />

was calculated in Eq. 5.15, by direct substitution <strong>of</strong> the lattice constant in<br />

Eq. 5.15 into Eq. 5.13. The lattice mismatch between In 0.5 Ga 0.5 As and Si matrix<br />

is around 7.5 %, which is almost 40 % less than the lattice mismatch in InAs QDs<br />

embedded into a Si matrix. After our standard ex-situ and in-situ surface preparation<br />

used in Sec. 5.4, a silicon buer layer with 50 nm thickness was grown on<br />

exactly oriented n-type Si (100) substrate at 700 ◦ C followed by 10 minutes PGA<br />

at 800 ◦ C. These steps were applied for all samples investigated in this section.<br />

The optimization <strong>of</strong> dierent <strong>growth</strong> parameters, such as In 0.5 Ga 0.5 As coverage,<br />

95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!