Molecular beam epitaxial growth of III-V semiconductor ... - KOBRA
Molecular beam epitaxial growth of III-V semiconductor ... - KOBRA
Molecular beam epitaxial growth of III-V semiconductor ... - KOBRA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
5.5 Self-Assembled InGaAs QDs Embedded in Si Matrix<br />
is driven by the thermal mismatch in Si/InAs system. At the end <strong>of</strong> the <strong>growth</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> QDs the system experience nearly local equilibrium state, with mist strain<br />
relieved totally by MD array. However, during cooling down the substrate temperature<br />
to the room temperature and due to the thermal mismatch, InAs will<br />
shrink faster than Si by keeping constant structure volume. Therefore, introduction<br />
<strong>of</strong> thermal stress during cooling down to room temperature resulted in extra<br />
mist dislocations generation. Similar strain analysis done for samples with 1<br />
and 2 MLs InAs QDs coverage and showed almost same observations as 4 MLs<br />
InAs sample. As a conclusion from strain study, a fully relaxed InAs QDs formation<br />
has been observed and mostly with semi-coherent dots formation. However,<br />
the lattice strain relaxation is released by dislocation loops localized along the<br />
InAs/Si interface consisting <strong>of</strong> perfect 60 ◦ -type dislocations. The thermal stress<br />
is released by SFs and MTs generation during cool down process, which have been<br />
observed in some cases.<br />
5.5 Self-Assembled InGaAs QDs Embedded in Si<br />
Matrix<br />
In order to reduce the lattice mismatch between <strong>III</strong>-V quantum dots and silicon,<br />
indium concentration in In x Ga 1−x As QDs was reduced to 50 %. The lattice mismatch<br />
is measured by the mist parameter (f) dened by Eq. 5.13. However, the<br />
mist parameter (f ) is a function <strong>of</strong> the alloy composition (x) in ternary <strong>semiconductor</strong><br />
compounds like In x Ga 1−x As [90]. The lattice constant <strong>of</strong> In x Ga 1−x As can<br />
be obtained by Eq. 5.14. Therefore, for 50 % indium composition the lattice constant<br />
was calculated in Eq. 5.15, by direct substitution <strong>of</strong> the lattice constant in<br />
Eq. 5.15 into Eq. 5.13. The lattice mismatch between In 0.5 Ga 0.5 As and Si matrix<br />
is around 7.5 %, which is almost 40 % less than the lattice mismatch in InAs QDs<br />
embedded into a Si matrix. After our standard ex-situ and in-situ surface preparation<br />
used in Sec. 5.4, a silicon buer layer with 50 nm thickness was grown on<br />
exactly oriented n-type Si (100) substrate at 700 ◦ C followed by 10 minutes PGA<br />
at 800 ◦ C. These steps were applied for all samples investigated in this section.<br />
The optimization <strong>of</strong> dierent <strong>growth</strong> parameters, such as In 0.5 Ga 0.5 As coverage,<br />
95