23.03.2014 Views

27 February 2007 - Ordinary Meeting of Council (pdf. 14MB)

27 February 2007 - Ordinary Meeting of Council (pdf. 14MB)

27 February 2007 - Ordinary Meeting of Council (pdf. 14MB)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Ordinary</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Council</strong> - <strong>27</strong> <strong>February</strong> <strong>2007</strong> 5 / 2<br />

Item 5<br />

S0<strong>27</strong>79<br />

2 <strong>February</strong> <strong>2007</strong><br />

PURPOSE OF REPORT<br />

To present to <strong>Council</strong> an analysis <strong>of</strong> the NSW Department <strong>of</strong> Local Government Comparative Data<br />

Report for 2004/2005.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

The 2006-2010 Management Plan requires that a formal report be presented to <strong>Council</strong> to analyse<br />

the NSW Department <strong>of</strong> Local Government Comparative Data report for 2004/2005. The<br />

requirement as contained in the Management Plan is as follows:<br />

Principal Activity:<br />

Performance Indicator:<br />

Due Date:<br />

<strong>Council</strong>’s Corporate Services<br />

Report and analysis <strong>of</strong> NSW Department <strong>of</strong> Local Government<br />

Comparative Data report 2004/2005 to <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

2 nd quarter<br />

COMMENTS<br />

Each year the Department <strong>of</strong> Local Government releases ‘The Comparative Information Return on<br />

New South Wales Local Government <strong>Council</strong>s’. The latest report released in January <strong>2007</strong> is for<br />

the 2004/2005 financial year. The data is collected by an electronic survey <strong>of</strong> <strong>Council</strong>s as well as<br />

from <strong>Council</strong>s’ Annual Financial Statements, NSW Grants Commission Returns and Notional Rate<br />

Returns.<br />

Comparative information provided for Local Government enables a performance assessment to be<br />

carried out with other ‘like’ <strong>Council</strong>s.<br />

When comparing one <strong>Council</strong> with another it is important to be aware that the key performance<br />

indicators do not on their own give the full picture <strong>of</strong> a <strong>Council</strong>’s performance. The figures provide<br />

indicators only and conclusions should not be drawn without qualitative assessments being made.<br />

The Australian Classification <strong>of</strong> Local Governments categorises <strong>Council</strong>s according to their socioeconomic<br />

characteristics and their capacity to deliver a range <strong>of</strong> services to the community.<br />

• Initially, it is a system based on whether a <strong>Council</strong> is principally ‘Urban’ or ‘Rural’.<br />

• Urban <strong>Council</strong>s are then subdivided on the basis <strong>of</strong> whether they are ‘capital cities’,<br />

‘metropolitan developed’, ‘regional town/city’ or ‘fringe’.<br />

• The final classification step is division based on population size.<br />

N:\0702<strong>27</strong>-OMC-SR-03649-NSW DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL G.doc/athaide /2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!