27 February 2007 - Ordinary Meeting of Council (pdf. 14MB)

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Legal Expenses to Total Planning and Development Costs This indicator is expressed as a percentage an is calculated by: Legal Expenses (Planning and Development) Total Planning and Building Control Costs Legal Expenses to Total Planning and Development Costs Group 3 Councils Legal Expenses to Total Planning and Development Costs Neighbouring Councils 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% Ku-ring-gai Bankstown Blacktown Canterbury Fairfield Holroyd Hurstville Marrickville Parramatta Randwick Rockdale Ryde Sutherland Warringah This indicator highlights the level of disputation in the planning and development process. Most of these planning and development expenses involve Development Applications, with other costs including enforcement and building matters. Ku-ring-gai is ranked the highest in this category when compared to Group 3 Councils and the highest compared to neighbouring Councils. Ku-ring-gai’s large number of Land and Environment Court matters contributes most significantly to legal costs in this area. Council’s legal expenses as a percentage to total planning and building control costs was 31.21%. Other factors which can affect this indicator are: the complexity of the legislation, level of compliance with development codes and plans, level of scrutiny applied to inspections and the level of community consultation in the formulation of policies. 35.00% 30.00% 25.00% 20.00% 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% Ku-ring-gai Hornsby Pittwater Ryde Warringah Willoughby Lane Cove North Sydney H:\My Documents - NOTHING FOR TRIM\Governance Stuff - see CDs\Burning Files to CD - NOT FOR TRIM\OMC 070227 Attachments\NSW Dept L.Govt Comparative Data 2004-2005\700194-Comparitive Data 2004_2005 New Format.DOC 26
Environmental Management and Health Expenses (per capita) The formula used for this indicator is: Total Environmental Management and Health Expenses Total Resident Population Environmental Management and Health Expenses (per capita) Group 3 Councils Environmental Management and Health Expenses (per capita) Neighbouring Councils $32.00 $28.00 $24.00 $20.00 $16.00 $12.00 $8.00 $4.00 $0.00 Ku-ring-gai Bankstown Blacktown Canterbury Fairfield Holroyd Hurstville Marrickville Parramatta Randwick Rockdale Ryde Sutherland Warringah This indicator measures the amount spent on environmental management and health per head of population. Ku-ring-gai at $10.33 is below the Group 3 Councils average of $13.47, and is lower than the neighbouring Councils average of $22.20. Blacktown’s average of $6.76 spent per resident was the lowest of the Group 3 Councils, while Warringah was the highest at $27.50. Within the neighbouring Councils North Sydney recorded the highest amount at $40.00 while Ryde spent the least amount at $7.24. The majority of NSW Councils have an average expense between $15 and $30 per resident for environmental management and health. Of all NSW Councils, $233 (Brewarrina) was the highest amount spent per resident and $2.58 (Albury) was the lowest. Factors influencing this indicator are the number of environmental management and health staff, the population mix, the land usage mix and socioeconomic factors. $40.00 $36.00 $32.00 $28.00 $24.00 $20.00 $16.00 $12.00 $8.00 $4.00 $0.00 Ku-ring-gai Hornsby Pittwater Ryde Warringah Willoughby Lane Cove North Sydney H:\My Documents - NOTHING FOR TRIM\Governance Stuff - see CDs\Burning Files to CD - NOT FOR TRIM\OMC 070227 Attachments\NSW Dept L.Govt Comparative Data 2004-2005\700194-Comparitive Data 2004_2005 New Format.DOC 27
Page 1 and 2:
ORDINARY MEETING OF COUNCIL TO BE H
Page 3 and 4:
GB.3 Policy on the Payment of Expen
Page 5 and 6:
GB.10 Alcohol Free Zones 181 . File
Page 7 and 8:
NM.3 Beechworth to Warragal Rezonin
Page 9 and 10:
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 27 Fe
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Contents Page Part 1 Introduction 1
Page 122 and 123:
• Participation, equity and acces
Page 124 and 125:
(4) Within 28 days after adopting a
Page 126 and 127:
Part 2 PAYMENT OF EXPENSES GENERAL
Page 128 and 129:
Where applicable the standard of an
Page 130 and 131:
Council shall meet the following co
Page 132 and 133: Travel Outside the Local Government
Page 134 and 135: Legal Expenses and Obligations 2.11
Page 136 and 137: Part 3 PROVISION OF FACILITIES GENE
Page 138 and 139: Meals and Refreshments Prior to or
Page 140 and 141: ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES
Page 142 and 143: Part 4 OTHER MATTERS Acquisition an
Page 144 and 145: Ordinary Meeting of Council - 27 Fe
Page 156 and 157: Ku-ring-gai Council Comparative Inf
Page 158 and 159: Below is a summary of the aims and
Page 160 and 161: • Domestic Waste per capita The p
Page 162 and 163: Average Rate per Residential Assess
Page 164 and 165: Outstanding Rates, Charges and Fees
Page 166 and 167: Reliance on Rates Revenue Reliance
Page 168 and 169: Dissection of Operating Expenses Th
Page 170 and 171: Total Operating Expenses (per capit
Page 172 and 173: Debt Service Ratio This indicator i
Page 174 and 175: Library Operating Expenses This ind
Page 176 and 177: Average Charge for Domestic Waste M
Page 178 and 179: Recyclables - Kilograms (per capita
Page 180 and 181: Number of Development Applications
Page 184 and 185: Net Recreation and Leisure Expenses
Page 186 and 187: N S W DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL GOVERNMEN
Page 188 and 189: Average Rate per Residential Assess
Page 190 and 191: Total Operating Revenue (per capita
Page 192 and 193: Debt Service Ratio 9.00% 8.00% 7.00
Page 194 and 195: Average Domestic Waste charge per R
Page 196 and 197: Number of Development Applications
Page 198 and 199: Net Recreation & Leisure Expenses (
Page 206 and 207: No Date Lodged Appeal # Appellant P
Page 208 and 209: Subdivision 1 December 14, 2004 115
Page 214 and 215: 2 The substation is listed on the S
Page 221: Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Pla
Page 228: Ordinary Meeting of Council - 27 Fe
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
1 3 28 3 5 7 22 20 35 33 D PROPOSED
Page 238 and 239:
From: Keiron Jeanes [mailto:jean1ke
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280 and 281:
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285:
Page 286 and 287:
Page 288 and 289:
Appendix A: Summary Review Summary
Page 290 and 291:
Department: COMMUNITY SERVICES CC R
Page 292 and 293:
Department: PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT
Page 294 and 295:
Department: TECHNICAL SERVICES CC R
Page 296 and 297:
Department: FINANCE & BUSINESS CC R
Page 298 and 299:
Department: FINANCE & BUSINESS CC R
Page 300 and 301:
Department: DEVELOPMENT & REGULATIO
Page 302:
Department: CAPITAL WORKS PN RC Tas
Page 375 and 376:
show all

27 February 2007 - Ordinary Meeting of Council (pdf. 14MB)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?