27 February 2007 - Ordinary Meeting of Council (pdf. 14MB)
27 February 2007 - Ordinary Meeting of Council (pdf. 14MB)
27 February 2007 - Ordinary Meeting of Council (pdf. 14MB)
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Ordinary</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Council</strong> - <strong>27</strong> <strong>February</strong> <strong>2007</strong> 6 / 6<br />
Item 6<br />
S02466<br />
6 <strong>February</strong> <strong>2007</strong><br />
SUMMARY BY WARD<br />
A summary <strong>of</strong> Land & Environment Court costs by ward is shown in the following table:<br />
Land & Environment Court costs by Ward for the financial year 2006/<strong>2007</strong><br />
Comenarra $23,916 6.3%<br />
Gordon $11,730 3.1%<br />
Roseville $66,335 17.4%<br />
St Ives $172,822 45.2%<br />
Wahroonga $107,330 28.0%<br />
Total Costs $382,133 100.0%<br />
OUTCOMES<br />
At an early stage <strong>of</strong> each appeal, <strong>Council</strong> as respondent, is required to file with the Court a<br />
Statement <strong>of</strong> Issues outlining the grounds which <strong>Council</strong> asserts as warranting refusal <strong>of</strong> a<br />
development, or alternatively, that may be addressed by way <strong>of</strong> conditions <strong>of</strong> consent.<br />
In cases where issues raised by <strong>Council</strong> are capable <strong>of</strong> resolution by the provision by the applicant<br />
<strong>of</strong> additional information or amendment <strong>of</strong> the proposal, it is the Court’s expectation that this<br />
should occur. The Court’s current practice <strong>of</strong> appointing a Court-appointed expert witness, rather<br />
than allowing the parties to call their own expert evidence, strongly encourages this.<br />
In this context, any <strong>of</strong> three outcomes can be regarded as favorable, namely:<br />
1. If the appeal is in relation to a deemed refusal <strong>of</strong> an application which, upon assessment,<br />
is appropriate for approval: that the development is determined by <strong>Council</strong>, allowing the<br />
appeal to be discontinued by the applicant and avoiding as much as is practicable the<br />
incurring <strong>of</strong> unnecessary legal costs;<br />
2. If the issues raised by <strong>Council</strong> are capable <strong>of</strong> resolution by the applicant providing<br />
further information, or amending the proposal: that this occurs, so that development<br />
consent should be granted, either by <strong>Council</strong> or the Court;<br />
3. If the issues raised by <strong>Council</strong> are either not capable <strong>of</strong> resolution, or the applicant<br />
declines to take the steps that are necessary to resolve them: that the appeal is either<br />
discontinued by the applicant, or dismissed (refused) by the Court.<br />
Of the 31 appeals commenced in the half year ended December 2006, only 6 appeals were resolved<br />
in that period. Five <strong>of</strong> which were discontinued by the applicant.<br />
CONSULTATION<br />
Not applicable.<br />
N:\0702<strong>27</strong>-OMC-SR-03649-ANALYSIS OF LAND ENVIRON.doc/athaide /6