Student Services Program Review-Spring 2010 - Shasta College

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Student Services Program ReviewTRiO Upward Bound (UB)Reporting Director: Kathleen Mahar, Ed.D.General Program InformationThere are four US Department of Education programs: 1. Gaining Early Awareness andReadiness for Undergraduate Program (GEAR UP), 2. TRiO Educational Talent Search(ETS), 3. TRiO Student Support Services (SSS) and, 4. TRiO Upward Bound (UB). Allprograms are authorized under the Federal Higher Education and Opportunity Act andshare the common goal of increasing educational options for low income and/or firstgeneration college students.The Higher Education Act (HEA) was originally signed into law in 1965 to ensure thatpostsecondary education options were available to all students in the United States.The original act was the Johnson Administration’s attempt to remedy discriminatorypractices that had prevented low income students and student of color from enteringcollege and achieving their educational dreams. To achieve these goals, the HigherEducation Act allocated funds for programming that would: increase financial aidoptions; help students complete high school and enter postsecondary education;increase funding to institutions serving non-traditional students; and, improve collegeteaching programs for students seeking to teach in the K-12 system.The TRiO Programs gained prominence shortly after the original signing of the HigherEducation Act. The term TRiO actually refers to several different programs that servethose who are first generational college students and meet a low-income criteriaestablished by the US Department of Education. All TRiO programs are similar in thatthey provide tutoring, summer enrichment, financial aid awareness, enrollment supportand college tours for the students that participate in the program. Upward Bound (UB),which serves 9-12 grade students, began in 1964 and was first of the TRiO programs.Educational Talent Search (ETS), serving students from 6 th through 12 th grade wasadded in 1965, and the Student Support Services (SSS) Program, serving collegestudents, was added shortly thereafter. Together, these three programs were termedthe “TRiO” programs, although there are now a total of eight programs in the TRiO familywhich are all designed to encourage students from diverse, non-traditional backgroundsto pursue postsecondary education.President Clinton introduced the GEAR UP Program in 1997 as part of his K-12educational reform agenda. It was officially established during the 1998 renewal of theHigher Education Act. The GEAR UP Program’s primary difference from TRiO was itsfocus on whole school, systematic reform. Unlike the TRiO programs, which serveeligible students, the GEAR UP program serves eligible schools (those with 50% of morestudents eligible for Free and Reduced Lunch). GEAR UP programs provide directservices to cohorts of students as they follow them from 7 th grade through high schoolgraduation. GEAR UP also provides broader support for parents, teachers and“systematic reform efforts” such as curriculum alignment and data support.- 338 -
Comprehensive partnerships with public and private organizations are also arequirement of the GEAR UP Program Design.All GEAR UP and TRiO programs are governed by Title IV of the HEA. Title IVspecifically authorized student assistance and access programs that support studentsfrom low socio-economic backgrounds, students with disabilities, first-generation collegestudents and students of color.Four decades after its creation, the Higher Education Act continues to define the rolethat the federal government plays in postsecondary education. Federal legislation statesthat the HEA must be reviewed and amended every seven years. The last renewal wasextended for several years but finally came to resolution in 2008 with a slight namechange, the Higher Education and Opportunity Act (HEOA). The HEOA continues todictate the program design and direction of the GEAR UP and TRiO programs. Underthe new legislation, several program changes will be required in each of our projects.These changes will be introduced in phases for each program; specific details of theadaptations and the timelines for implementation are currently in federal negotiations.However these changes are extremely relevant for this program review because they willdictate the action plans/next steps for Upward Bound, and for the GEAR UP/TRiOdepartment as a whole.Program Definition/ DescriptionTRiO Upward BoundUpward Bound offers 50 9 th through 12 th grade students extensive academic instructionas well as counseling, mentoring and other support services. Students meet throughoutthe school year and participate in an intensive six week residential summer program.Most students—about 90 percent— enter Upward Bound while in ninth or tenth gradeand remain with the program through twelfth grade. The average annual cost perparticipant is approximately $3,600.Program Mission/PurposeUpward Bound provides fundamental support to eligible low-income, first-generationhigh school students in their preparation for college entrance. The program providesopportunities for participants to succeed in their pre-college performance and ultimatelyin their higher education pursuits. The goal of Upward Bound is to increase the rate atwhich participants complete secondary education and enroll in and graduate frominstitutions of postsecondary learning.Program SLOs/SAOsStudent Learning Outcomes:1. High school Upward Bound participants will learn about the two-year andfour-year college systems, which include types of institutions and therequirements for each.Assessment:Program records, participant tracking forms, and student survey.- 339 -
Page 1:
Shasta CollegeStudent ServicesProgr
Page 9 and 10:
Chair and counselor trainer. Anothe
Page 11 and 12:
Due to funding considerations, the
Page 13 and 14:
Lois CushnieFaculty Co-Chair, Matri
Page 15:
attend, several workshops were offe
Page 19:
In the area of Matriculation Servic
Page 27:
In speaking with colleagues at the
Page 30 and 31:
The following table shows the relea
Page 32 and 33:
The following table illustrates the
Page 34 and 35:
Counseling Center employees. The Co
Page 36 and 37:
TotalNumber ofFaculty*Number ofSubj
Page 38 and 39:
4. Retention and SuccessWe examined
Page 40 and 41:
OrientationOne process that was red
Page 42 and 43:
A note about orientation data: Orie
Page 44 and 45:
Table 18: Academic Standing by Acad
Page 46 and 47:
Saw aCounselorDid not see aCounselo
Page 48 and 49:
NumberAcademic Year07-08 08-09Perce
Page 50 and 51:
- 48 -Academic Year07-08 08-09Numbe
Page 52 and 53:
Academic Year07-08 08-09Number Perc
Page 54 and 55:
II. Quality StaffingWhenever the op
Page 56 and 57:
SAO: Counseling staff will develop
Page 58 and 59:
6. Need to continue to improve the
Page 60 and 61:
3. Continue to develop a comprehens
Page 62 and 63:
APPENDIX AShasta College - Who Part
Page 64 and 65:
APPENDIX AShasta College - Who Part
Page 66 and 67:
APPENDIX AShasta College - Impact o
Page 68 and 69:
APPENDIX AShasta College - Impact o
Page 70 and 71:
APPENDIX AShasta College - Orientat
Page 72 and 73:
APPENDIX AShasta College - Orientat
Page 74 and 75:
2. Admissions and Records staff wil
Page 76 and 77:
APPENDIX B - Program PlanAssessment
Page 78 and 79:
Strengths and Accomplishments:1. An
Page 80 and 81:
APPENDIX B - Program PlanCareer Cen
Page 82 and 83:
7. Workshops are held each year for
Page 84 and 85:
Service Area Outcomes:1. The Counse
Page 86 and 87:
6. We have had continuing problems
Page 88 and 89:
11. Represent Shasta College by par
Page 90 and 91:
4. Due to the increasing regional u
Page 92 and 93:
Community Engagement1. Enhance the
Page 94 and 95:
3. To be most effective, there is a
Page 96 and 97:
2. The Transfer Center will increas
Page 98 and 99:
APPENDIX CCounseling CenterAction P
Page 100:
SHASTA COLLEGEStudent ServicesProgr
Page 103 and 104:
Program SLOs/SAOsService Area Outco
Page 105 and 106:
Brian Spillane - Dean of StudentsSe
Page 107 and 108:
2. Contact with Other K-12 SchoolsO
Page 109 and 110:
Student Success1. Reach of Services
Page 111 and 112:
There was no previous program revie
Page 113:
Page 116 and 117:
Results of DataRecruitment of inter
Page 118 and 119:
2. Materials and EquipmentThe progr
Page 120 and 121:
8. Survey other CCs for Common Prac
Page 122 and 123:
Income: $4,324/FTES; any other ongo
Page 124 and 125:
Student Learning OutcomesThe follow
Page 126 and 127:
Allocate 10% of the International S
Page 128:
Page 131 and 132:
Program Service Area Quality1. Staf
Page 133 and 134:
College Nurse:Internally: Crisis In
Page 135 and 136:
Effectiveness surveys for the colle
Page 137 and 138:
The Student Health and Wellness Ser
Page 139 and 140:
5. Faculty and Classified StaffingS
Page 141 and 142:
It would be helpful if the program
Page 143 and 144:
The primary goal of Student Health
Page 145 and 146:
Goals, Recommendations, Priorities,
Page 147 and 148:
APPENDIX CStudent Health and Wellne
Page 149:
Page 152 and 153:
Program Mission/PurposeTo provide a
Page 154 and 155:
7. Internal Relations, Integration
Page 156 and 157:
2. Use of TechnologyThe Residence H
Page 158 and 159:
3. ProgressOnce a student becomes a
Page 160 and 161:
3. The Student Residential Housing
Page 162 and 163:
APPENDIX CStudent Residential Housi
Page 164:
Page 167 and 168:
Program Service Area Quality1. Staf
Page 169 and 170:
3. Contact with Community Colleges,
Page 171 and 172:
Student Success1. DataCurrently, st
Page 173 and 174:
Student Learning OutcomesA Student
Page 175 and 176:
APPENDIX CStudent Senate, Clubs, an
Page 178 and 179:
Student Services Program ReviewDisa
Page 180 and 181:
The California Community College Ch
Page 182 and 183:
Assessment: Periodic comparison wil
Page 184 and 185:
Assessment: Pre- and post-evaluatio
Page 186 and 187:
In May 2008, the full-time, tenured
Page 188 and 189:
Three tenured, non-instructional fa
Page 190 and 191:
As mentioned previously, all facult
Page 192 and 193:
into two areas. There is an 800 ft
Page 194 and 195:
semi-annually for dissemination of
Page 196 and 197:
EOPSFinancial AidMISShared space, c
Page 198 and 199:
In summer 2009, the DSPS reception
Page 200 and 201:
2. Use of TechnologySpecific suppor
Page 202 and 203:
6. EquipmentAll staff computers and
Page 204 and 205:
DSPS is the office designated by th
Page 206 and 207:
SemesterComparison of students in D
Page 208 and 209:
Table 19: Enrollment Level and Succ
Page 210 and 211:
5. Student SatisfactionStandardized
Page 212 and 213:
Goals, Recommendations, Priorities,
Page 214 and 215:
Table 21: Goals from Program Review
Page 216 and 217:
Appendix A - Student Learning Outco
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
APPENDIX CDisabled Students Program
Page 234:
Page 237 and 238:
EOPSProgramSemesterThe EOPS Program
Page 239 and 240:
Current Staffing LevelsEOPS is gove
Page 241 and 242:
Transfer AdvisingFee WaiversStudent
Page 243 and 244:
Awards ProgramFor the past ten year
Page 245 and 246:
8. Survey other CCs for Common Prac
Page 247 and 248:
In addition, some CSU counselors ha
Page 249 and 250:
As can be seen, Shasta College is a
Page 251 and 252:
8. Reach of ServicesAn adjunct EOPS
Page 253 and 254:
Figure 1: EOPS Course Enrollment by
Page 255 and 256:
Table: 13 Units Completed by EOPS S
Page 257 and 258:
Table 15 is mostly incomplete, but
Page 259 and 260:
EOPS at Shasta College does outreac
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Service Area OutcomeEOPS/CARE wants
Page 265:
Page 268 and 269:
egin college without a high school
Page 270 and 271:
Staff processed over 6,000 complete
Page 272 and 273:
$142,000.00 in state scholarships d
Page 274 and 275:
6. EquipmentThe only issue with equ
Page 276 and 277:
2. Access3. Progress4. SuccessThe C
Page 278 and 279:
that may affect their financial aid
Page 280 and 281:
Challenges3. The ability to offer s
Page 282 and 283:
APPENDIX AFinancial Aid OfficeStude
Page 284:
Page 287 and 288:
“systematic reform efforts” suc
Page 289 and 290: Program Service Area Quality1. Staf
Page 291 and 292: serve on the accreditation team as
Page 293 and 294: On-going attempts to raise awarenes
Page 295 and 296: enefit from additional program part
Page 297 and 298: Table 2: Outcome Data for 2009-2010
Page 299 and 300: 2. (continued) Current 10 th Grader
Page 301 and 302: 5. Each project year, GEAR UP stude
Page 303 and 304: 8. (continued) 9 th and 10 th Grade
Page 305 and 306: General PlanningThe GEAR UP program
Page 307 and 308: APPENDIX CGaining Early Awareness a
Page 310 and 311: Student Services Program ReviewTRiO
Page 312 and 313: Program SLOs/SAOsService Area Outco
Page 314 and 315: US Department of Education, communi
Page 316 and 317: Greater collaboration with CSU Chic
Page 318 and 319: primary database for tracking progr
Page 320 and 321: Table 2: Outcome Data for 2009Objec
Page 322 and 323: Table 4: HEOA Amendments and Impact
Page 324: SHASTA COLLEGEStudent ServicesProgr
Page 327 and 328: change, the Higher Education and Op
Page 329 and 330: will lead program design and counse
Page 331 and 332: communication between program staff
Page 333 and 334: 5. Faculty and Classified StaffingT
Page 335 and 336: Student Learning OutcomesStudent Le
Page 337 and 338: APPENDIX CTRiO Student Support Serv
Page 342 and 343: 2. Upward Bound High school partici
Page 344 and 345: ) if having a common Director would
Page 346 and 347: strong relationships with our partn
Page 348 and 349: 3. Comparison with Other Institutio
Page 350 and 351: Table 2: Outcome Data for 2009Objec
Page 352 and 353: Goals, Recommendations, Priorities,
show all

Student Services Program Review-Spring 2010 - Shasta College

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?