13.07.2015 Views

History of medical practice in Illinois - Bushnell Historical Society

History of medical practice in Illinois - Bushnell Historical Society

History of medical practice in Illinois - Bushnell Historical Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

348 <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> Medical Practice <strong>in</strong> Ill<strong>in</strong>oisThe amphitheatre was soon full and as it was a hot day <strong>in</strong> May the place wasstifl<strong>in</strong>g. The emaciated corpse was brought <strong>in</strong> on a stretcher and dumpedon the revolv<strong>in</strong>g copper autopsy table. One <strong>of</strong> the County Hospital <strong>in</strong>ternesbegan to cut open the chest and abdomen as Dr. Belfield recited the history<strong>of</strong> the patient and the physical antemortem f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs. The exam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong>the sputum was particularly accented and students were <strong>in</strong>vited to comedown <strong>in</strong>to the arena and see the newly discovered Bacillus tuberculosis <strong>of</strong>Koch. Then the manner <strong>of</strong> sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g was actually demonstrated upon thesqueez<strong>in</strong>gs from the lungs <strong>of</strong> the cadaver, which had now been silentlyautopsied by the <strong>in</strong>terne. As my memory serves me this was the most concise,complete, and conv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g pathological lecture I have ever heard. It rema<strong>in</strong>s<strong>in</strong> the foreground <strong>of</strong> my m<strong>in</strong>d wherever tuberculosis is called to my attention."Dr. Belfield had not then been combatted long enough to arouse hissubsequent manner <strong>of</strong> discussion, which was <strong>of</strong>ten cynical and ironical.But to me his manner has always been <strong>in</strong>telligible and explicable. He wasa <strong>medical</strong> scout who brought disagreeable news to those who did not wishto change their m<strong>in</strong>ds, and were satisfiedwith the hereditary factor onwhich they expla<strong>in</strong>ed their etiologic theory <strong>of</strong> tuberculosis."In February 1883 Belfield gave the Cartwright Lectures <strong>in</strong> New YorkCity, on the relations <strong>of</strong> micro-organisms to disease. These lectures werepublished <strong>in</strong> the Medical Record and repr<strong>in</strong>ted <strong>in</strong> book form. This bookwas well received. I now quote from a review signed H. G. (HenryGradle?)."While these lectures can hardly <strong>in</strong>troduce a student fully <strong>in</strong>to our presentknowledge <strong>of</strong> bacteria, they serve admirably to place the topic <strong>in</strong> alucid and comprehensive way before physicians partly acqua<strong>in</strong>ted withthe details. When we reflect upon the amount <strong>of</strong> prejudice the germ theoryencounters <strong>in</strong> this country, it seems proper, that the lecturer should haveassumed a polemic, and even an aggressive tone. Although this style maynot help to conciliate his opponents, it cannot be said that Dr. Belfield isunjust <strong>in</strong> his remarks. Sarcasm is one <strong>of</strong> the best weapons aga<strong>in</strong>st ignorance,especially, when so well put as <strong>in</strong> these lectures."In his discussion <strong>of</strong> endocarditis, it seems that Belfield had forgotten hisown report <strong>of</strong> Fenger's demonstration <strong>of</strong> cocci <strong>in</strong> endocarditis before theChicago Pathological <strong>Society</strong> <strong>in</strong> 1879. Belfield was <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ed to speak ratherslight<strong>in</strong>gly <strong>of</strong> Pasteur and <strong>of</strong> Klebs. Of Pasteur he said that the hasty andsometimes erroneous conclusions which Pasteur had published "illustratethe <strong>in</strong>ability <strong>of</strong> his judgment to cope with his imag<strong>in</strong>ation." It is reasonableto assume that Belfield had not escaped the <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> the prejudicethen prevalent <strong>in</strong> Germany aga<strong>in</strong>st Pasteur's work. Belfield evaluated thediscovery <strong>of</strong> the tubercle bacillus as follows:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!