13.07.2015 Views

History of medical practice in Illinois - Bushnell Historical Society

History of medical practice in Illinois - Bushnell Historical Society

History of medical practice in Illinois - Bushnell Historical Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

368 <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> Medical Practice <strong>in</strong> Ill<strong>in</strong>oisact to prevent the dis<strong>in</strong>terment <strong>of</strong> the dead." Dr. Zeuch <strong>in</strong> Volume I"The <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> Medical Practice <strong>in</strong> Ill<strong>in</strong>ois (preced<strong>in</strong>g 1850)" expressedthe op<strong>in</strong>ion that it manifested antagonism to the <strong>medical</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>ession becauseit would h<strong>in</strong>der physicians and surgeons from obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and us<strong>in</strong>ghuman cadavers for dissection. But a read<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> that law shows that thoughthe lawmakers were swayed by the prejudices <strong>of</strong> the times, they did providelegal means <strong>of</strong> secur<strong>in</strong>g such anatomical material even if the material soobta<strong>in</strong>ed was woefully <strong>in</strong>adequate. For after the Act states that"If any person or persons shall open the grave or tomb where the body or bodies<strong>of</strong> any deceased person or persons shall have been deposited, and shall remove thebody or bodies or rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> any deceased person or persons from the grave orplace <strong>of</strong> sepulture, for the purpose <strong>of</strong> dissection, or any surgical or anatomicalexperiment or any other purpose, without the knowledge and consent <strong>of</strong> the nearrelatives <strong>of</strong> the deceased, or shall <strong>in</strong> any way aid, assist, counsel or procure thesame to be done, or shall aid or assist <strong>in</strong> any surgical or anatomical experimenttherewith, or dissection there<strong>of</strong>, know<strong>in</strong>g said body or bodies to have been sotaken or removed from the place or places <strong>of</strong> their sepulture, every such personso <strong>of</strong>fend<strong>in</strong>g, be<strong>in</strong>g there<strong>of</strong> duly convicted, by <strong>in</strong>dictment before the circuit court,shall forfeit and pay a f<strong>in</strong>e not exceed<strong>in</strong>g five hundred dollars, and shall be imprisoned<strong>in</strong> the common jail <strong>of</strong> the county, not more than twelve nor less thanthree months, at the discretion <strong>of</strong> the court, the f<strong>in</strong>e for the use <strong>of</strong> the county tobe paid as other f<strong>in</strong>es are required to be," it is"Provided that the provisions <strong>of</strong> this act shall not be construed to extend to thedissection <strong>of</strong> the body <strong>of</strong> any crim<strong>in</strong>al, where the same has been or shallbe directedto be delivered up for such dissection by competent authority."<strong>of</strong>For a clearer view <strong>of</strong> the progress <strong>of</strong> anatomical legislation <strong>in</strong> Ill<strong>in</strong>ois,it is appropriate to digress here and refer briefly to the history <strong>of</strong> suchlegislation <strong>in</strong> other parts <strong>of</strong> the United States that were colonized muchearlier. A colonial writer, one named Eliot, 11 reports <strong>in</strong> a communicationpublished <strong>in</strong> London <strong>in</strong> 1647, as follows:"Our young students <strong>in</strong> Physic may be tra<strong>in</strong>ed up better than yet they bee, whohave onely theoretical knowledge and are forced to fall to <strong>practice</strong> before everthey saw an anatomie made, or duly tra<strong>in</strong>ed up <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g experiments for wenever had but one anatomie <strong>in</strong> the Countrey, which Mr. Giles Firm<strong>in</strong> (now <strong>in</strong>England) did make and read upon very well, but no more <strong>of</strong> that now."It is probable that this dissection was made at Ipswich, Massachusetts,sometime between 1641 and 1644 on a body acquired legally. 12 In 1641—twenty years after the land<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the Puritan pilgrims at Plymouth,Massachusetts—the colony had formulated its first code <strong>of</strong> laws knownas "The Body <strong>of</strong> Liberties." Among its decrees is one which runs:u Eliot, J.:The Day break<strong>in</strong>g if not the Sunris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the Gospell with the Indians <strong>in</strong>New England. 366 pp. London. Richard Cotes, 1647. Repr<strong>in</strong>ted <strong>in</strong> Collections <strong>of</strong> theMassachusetts <strong>Historical</strong> <strong>Society</strong>, 98 pp. Vol. 4. Cambridge: Charles Folsom, 1834. P. 57.12Waters, T. F.: Ipswich <strong>in</strong> the Massachusetts Bay Colony. 336 pp. Salem. The SalemPress, 1905.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!