13.07.2015 Views

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A-Z 977Rradical [Lat. radix ‘root’]1 Speech sound classified according to its articulator (radix=root <strong>of</strong> the tongue). As arule, radicals are divided into uvulars (e.g. ) <strong>and</strong> pharyngeals (e.g. [ħ], ),depending on their place <strong>of</strong> articulation. ( also articulatory phonetics, phonetics)phonetics2 Chinese writingReferencesRain Forest BantuBanturaisingIn transformational grammar, a rule for deriving certain infinitive constructions bywhich the subject noun phrase <strong>of</strong> an embedded sentence is ‘raised’ into the subject orobject position <strong>of</strong> the matrix sentence in the transition from deep structure to surfacestructure. The rest <strong>of</strong> the sentence is marked as ‘infinitive.’ The so-called accusativeplus infinitive constructions were considered to be cases <strong>of</strong> raising in the early phases <strong>of</strong>transformational grammar: Caroline let/heard her brother come, in which the ‘logical’ ordeep structure subject <strong>of</strong> come is raised to the ‘grammatical’ or surface structure object <strong>of</strong>let/hear (see Postal 1974). In later theories, object raising was discarded in favor <strong>of</strong> anon-transformational analysis. Constructions with auxiliary-like expressions aredescribed as raising into the subject position: Philip seems [—to read a lot]. Whereas inconstructions with control <strong>of</strong> a logical argument <strong>of</strong> the infinitive, the matrix verb(=control verb) must have a semantic argument as ‘controller,’ it is a characteristic <strong>of</strong>raising constructions that the grammatical subject <strong>of</strong> the matrix predicate is not thelogical subject <strong>of</strong> the matrix verb (the so-called raising verb), but only <strong>of</strong> the embeddedverb. This becomes clear in the paraphrase It seems that Philip reads a lot, in whichPhilip is not the logical argument <strong>of</strong> the raising verb seem. In the movement <strong>of</strong> quantified

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!