Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

A-Z 1077Bellugi, U. and D.Newkirk. 1981. Formal devices for creating new signs in American signlanguage. Sign Language Studies 30.1–35.Bergman, B. 1984. Non-manual components in signed language: some sentence types in Swedishsign language. In F.Loncke et al. (eds), Recent research on European sign languages. Lisse.49–59.Bergman, B. and Ö.Dahl. 1990. Idiophones in sign language? The place of reduplication in thetenseaspect system of Swedish Sign Language. In C. Bache et al. (eds) Tense-aspect-modality:new data—new approaches., The Hague.Brennan, M. and G.Turner. 1994. Word-order issues in sign language working papers. Durham.Coulter, G.R. (ed.) 1993. Phonetics and phonology, vol. 3: Current issues in ASL phonology. SanDiego, CA.Deuchar, M. 1984. British sign language. London.Ebbinghaus, H. and J.Hessmann, 1990. German words in German sign language. In S.Prillwitz andT.Vollhaber (eds), Current trends in European sign language research. Hamburg. 97–112.Engberg-Pedersen, E. 1993. Space in Danish Sign Language. Hamburg.Fischer, S. and P.Siple (eds) 1990. Theoretical issues in sign language research. Chicago, IL.Kendon, A. 1989. Sign languages of Aboriginal Australia. Cambridge.Klima, E.S. and U.Bellugi (eds) 1979. The signs of language. London.Lane, H. and F.Grosjean (eds) 1989. Recent perspectives on American sign language. Hove.Liddell, S.C. and R.E.Johnson. 1989. American sign language: the phonological base. SignLanguage Studies 64.195–277.Liddell, S.K. 1980. American sign language syntax. The Hague.Lillo-Martin, D.C. 1991. Universal grammar and American sign language. Dordrecht.Lucas, C. (ed.) 1990. Sign language research: Theoretical issues. Washington, DC.Lucas, C. and C.Valli. 1989. Language contact in the American deaf community. In C.Lucas (ed.),The sociolinguistics of the deaf community. San Diego. CA. 11–40.McIntire, M. et al. (eds) 1987. Hands and faces: a preliminary inventory for written ASL. SignLanguage Studies 56.197–241.Newport, E.L. 1988. Constraints on learning and their role in language acquisition: Studies of theacquisition of American Sign Language. LangS 10.147–72.Newport, E.L. and R.P.Meier. 1985. The acquisition of American Sign Language. In D.L.Stobin(ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition, 2 vols. Hillsdale, NJ.Padden, C.A. 1988a. Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. NewYork.——1988b. Grammatical theory and signed languages. In Frederick Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics:The Cambridge survey. Cambridge. Vol. 2, 250–66.Padden, C. and T.Humpries. 1988. Deaf in America. Cambridge.Prillwitz, S. and H.Zienert. 1990. Hamburg notation system for sign language: development of asign writing with computer application. In S.Prillwitz and T.Vollhaber (eds.), Current trends inEuropean sign language research. Hamburg. 355–79.Reilly, J.S. et al. 1990. Faces: the relationship between language and affect. In V.Volterra andC.J.Erting (eds), From gesture to language in hearing and deaf children. Berlin. 128–41.——1992. Affective prosody in American sign language. Sign Language Studies 75.113–28.Sandler, W. 1990. Temporal aspects and ASL phonology. In S.Fischer and P.Siple (eds),Theoretical issues in sign language research, vol. 1: Linguistics. Chicago. 7–35.Schermer, T.M. 1990. In search of language: influences from spoken Dutch on Sign Language ofthe Netherlands. Delft.Stokoe, W. 1960. Sign language structure: an outline of the visual communication systems of theAmerican Deaf. Buffalo, NY.Supalla, T. 1982. Structure and acquisition of verbs of motion and location in American SignLanguage. Unpublished dissertation, University of California, San Diego.