13.07.2015 Views

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A-Z 999relative adjectiveadjectiverelative clauseSubordinate clause which is dependent on a noun or pronoun, is usually introduced bya relative pronoun or relative adverb, <strong>and</strong> can refer to various elements (or even a wholesentence) except for the predicate. Depending on the semantic/pragmatic function, adistinction is usually made between defining/ restrictive <strong>and</strong> amplifying/non-restrictiverelative clauses. Restrictive clauses limit the set <strong>of</strong> possible objects the noun specified bythe clause can refer to: Here is the book that you were looking for (<strong>and</strong> none other thanthat one), while amplifying clauses specify their referent more exactly: Napoleon, whocame from Corsica, was exiled to Elba. These two types <strong>of</strong> clause, which <strong>of</strong>ten allow fortwo or more interpretations, can be distinguished from one another by examining thefollowing characteristics <strong>of</strong> the surface structure: in restrictive clauses, which are alwaysa part <strong>of</strong> a definite description, the referent can be emphasized by using a demonst rativepronoun (that book, which), while in non-restrictive clauses the referent is <strong>of</strong>ten a propernoun or personal pronoun, <strong>and</strong> the whole sentence can usually be modified by addingwords or phrases such as apparently or as is well known, which underline its purelyattributive character. In addition, non-restrictive clauses are optional, while definingclauses are obligatory. This distinction is also supported by various intonationalproperties.ReferencesBartsch, R. 1976. Syntax <strong>and</strong> semantics <strong>of</strong> relative clauses. Amsterdam.Downing, B.T. 1978. Some universals <strong>of</strong> relative clause structure. In J.H.Greenberg et al. (eds),Universals <strong>of</strong> human language. Stanford, CA. 375–418.Helg<strong>and</strong>er. J. 1971. The relative clause in English <strong>and</strong> other Germanic languages: a historical <strong>and</strong>analytical survey. Göteborg.Keenan, E.L. 1985. Relative clauses. In T.Shopen (ed.). <strong>Language</strong> typology <strong>and</strong> linguisticdescription. Cambridge. Vol. 2, 141–70.Kleiber, G. 1987. Relatives restrictives et relatives appositives: une opposition ‘introuvable.’Tübingen.Lehmann, C. 1984. Der Relativsatz. Tübingen.Prideaux, G. <strong>and</strong> W.J.Baker. 1987. Strategies <strong>and</strong> structure: the processing <strong>of</strong> relative clauses.Amsterdam.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!