Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

A-Z 761ReferencesBinnick, R.I. 1981. On the classification of the Mongolian languages. Toronto.Grønbech, K. and J.R.Krueger. 1993. An introduction to classical (literary) Mongolian, 3rdcorrected edn. Wiesbaden.Poppe, N. 1955. Introduction to Mongolian comparative studies. Helsinki.——1970. Mongolian language handbook. Washington, DC.——1974. Grammar of written Mongolian, 4th unrev. printing. Wiesbaden.Spuler, B. and H.Kees (eds) 1964. Mongolistik. (Handbuch der Orientalistik 5.2.) Leiden.Vietze, H.-P. 1969. Lehrbuch der mongolischen Sprache. Munich. (5th edn Leipzig, 1987.)DictionaryHangin, G. 1986. A modern Mongolian-English dictionary. Bloomington, IN.monitor modelIn second language acquisition, a hypothetical model developed by Krashen (1981),according to which language production in a second language is overseen by a type ofcontrolling mechanism (‘monitor’) which checks for correctness of forms. The extent ofthis monitoring (which varies according to the type of language learner) is believed tohave an effect on the nature of foreign language acquisition. Hence, Krashendistinguishes between ‘learning’ (heavy reliance upon the monitor) and ‘acquisition’(little reliance upon the monitor). ( also natural approach)ReferencesColson, J.-P. 1989. Krashens monitortheorie: een experimentele studie van het Nederlands alsvreemde taal/La Théorie du moniteur de Krashen: une étude expérimentale du néerlandais,langue étrangère. Leuven.Krashen, S.D. 1981. Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford.——1985. The input hypothesis: issues and implications. London.McLaughlin, B. 1987. Theories of second language learning. London.second language acquisition