13.07.2015 Views

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Dictionary</strong> <strong>of</strong> language <strong>and</strong> linguistics 632Slobin, D.I. 1972. Leopold’s blbliography <strong>of</strong> child language, revised <strong>and</strong> augmented. Bloomington,IN.JournalsChild Development.First <strong>Language</strong>.Journal <strong>of</strong> Child <strong>Language</strong>.developmental language disorder, language acquisition device, languagedisorder, psycholinguistics, universal grammarlanguage acquisition device (abbrev. LAD)Specifically human mechanism postulated by N.Chomsky, in connection with thelinguistic interpretation <strong>of</strong> rationalism, to explain the phenomenon that children—although the linguistic utterances <strong>of</strong> their environment represent only deficient <strong>and</strong>incomplete input—gain a comm<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the syntactic rules <strong>of</strong> their mother tongue in arelatively short time <strong>and</strong> can produce <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong> an almost unlimited number <strong>of</strong>grammatical expressions. Every child is equipped with an innate schema for validgrammars ( universals) <strong>and</strong> with a system <strong>of</strong> cognitive procedures for developing <strong>and</strong>checking hypotheses about the input. Thus, a child formulates hypotheses about thegrammatical structure <strong>of</strong> the given sentences, makes predictions about them, <strong>and</strong> checksthese predictions with new sentences. He/she eliminates those sentences that contradictthe evidence <strong>and</strong> validates those that were not eliminated through the criterion <strong>of</strong>simplicity. This mechanism is engaged with the very first input. The child essentiallyforms a theory, comparable to that <strong>of</strong> a linguist who constructs a descriptively <strong>and</strong>explanatorily adequate theory <strong>of</strong> a language. This parallel, at the same time, justifieslinguists in considering problems <strong>of</strong> language acquisition with linguistic methods <strong>of</strong>investigation. See Levelt’s (1975) critique <strong>of</strong> the language acquisition device.ReferencesChomsky, N. 1965. Aspects <strong>of</strong> the theory <strong>of</strong> syntax. Cambridge, MA.——1975. Reflections on language. New York.Katz, J.J. 1966. The philosophy <strong>of</strong> language. London.Levelt, W.J.M. 1975. What became <strong>of</strong> LAD? The Hague.McNeill, D. 1970. The acquisition <strong>of</strong> language: the study <strong>of</strong> developmental psycholinguistics. NewYork.Piatelli-Palmarini, M. (ed.) 1980. <strong>Language</strong> <strong>and</strong> learning. London.language acquisition, mentalism, psycholinguistics, universals

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!