Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

Dictionary of language and linguistics 944ReferencesChomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA.——1968. Language and mind. New York.Freidin, R. 1978. Cyclicity and the theory of grammar. LingI 9. 519–49.Kiparsky, P. 1982. From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology. In H.van der Hulst and N.Smith(eds), The structure of phonological representation, part 1. Dordrecht. 131–75.Pelletier, F.J. 1980. The generative power of rule orderings in formal grammars. Linguistics 18. 17–72.Pullum, G. 1979. Rule interaction and the organization of a grammar. New York.Ross, J.R. 1967. On the cyclic nature of English pronominalization. In To honor Roman Jakobson:essays on the occasion of his seventieth birthday, 11 October 1966. The Hague. Vol. 3, 1669–82.Rudin, C. 1981. ‘Who what to whom said’: an argument from Bulgarian against cyclic whmovement.PCLS 17. 353–60.Soames, S. and D.M.Perlmutter. 1979. Syntactic argumentation and the structure of English.Berkeley, CA.Williams, E. 1977. Rule ordering in syntax. Dissertation, Bloomington, IN.——1982. The NP-cycle. LingI 13. 277–95.constraints, transformational grammarprinciple of directionalityA syntactic rule for co-ordinating structures. The first of two co-referential constituentscan be deleted in a co-ordinating structure only if the constituent appears in the righthandbranch of a node in a tree diagram, whereas the second element can be deletedonly if it branches to the left. For example, Philip looks for Caroline and Philip findsCaroline can become Philip looks for and finds Caroline because the first instance ofCaroline occurs to the right of looks for and the second instance of Philip occurs to theleft of looks for. ( gapping)Referencesco-ordination, transformational grammar