Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

A-Z 739react as soon as the relevant item appears. It is assumed that the reaction time is shorter ifthe items preceding the target item are not complex in phonological or semantic structure.ReferencesAitchison, J. 1987. Words in the mind: an introduction 10 the mental lexicon. Oxford.Altmann, G.T.M. (ed.) 1990. Cognitive models of speech processing. Cambridge, MA.Bresnan, J. (ed.) 1982. The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA.Dunbar, G. 1991. The cognitive lexicon. Tübingen.Emmorey, K.D. and V.A.Fromkin. 1988. The mental lexicon. In F.Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics:the Cambridge survey. Cambridge. Vol. 3, 124–49.Fodor, J.A. 1978. Modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA.Forster, K.I. 1981. Priming and the effects of sentence and lexical contexts in naming times:evidence for autonomous lexical processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 33.465–95.Halle, M, J.Bresnan. and G.A.Miller (eds) 1978. Linguistic theory and psychological reality.Cambridge, MA.Henderson, L. 1985. Towards a psychology of morphemes. In A.W.Ellis (ed.), Progress in thepsychology of language. London. Vol. 1, 15–72.Johnson-Laird, P.N. 1983. Mental models. Cambridge, MA.Kintsch, W. 1974. The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, NJ.Kohn, S.A. et al. 1987. Lexical retrieval: the tip of the tongue phenomenon. AppliedPsycholinguistics 8. 245–66.Levelt, W.J.M. 1989. Speaking: from intention to articulation. Cambridge.Marslen-Wilson, W. 1987. Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition 25. 71–102.——(ed.) 1989. Lexical representation and process. Cambridge, MA.Marslen-Wilson, W. and A.Welsh. 1978. Processing interactions and lexical access during wordrecognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology 10. 29–63.Martin, N., R.W.Weisberg, and E.M.Saffran. 1989. Variables influencing the occurrence of namingerrors: implication for models of lexical retrieval. Journal of Memory and Language 28. 462–85.Mehler, J. et al. 1982. Perspectives on mental representation. Hillsdale, NJ.language comprehension, language productionmentalismPsychological and philosophical concept picked up and developed by Chomsky (1965)and modeled after Descartes’ and von Humboldt’s rationalism. Mentalism attempts todescribe the internal (innate) language mechanism that provides the basis for the creativeaspect of language development and use. In this program, Chomsky turns against theempirical approach of American structuralism (Bloomfield) and, especially, againstSkinner’s behaviorist interpretation of language ( behaviorism), since both positionsaccept only immediately observable linguistic data as their object of investigation. By