13.07.2015 Views

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Dictionary</strong> <strong>of</strong> language <strong>and</strong> linguistics 770morphological reanalysisanalogymorphologizationChange <strong>of</strong> a phonological rule into a morphological regularity through the loss <strong>of</strong> anoriginally present phonetic motivational factor. Thus, the plural formation by umlaut(foot: feet), which was originally conditioned by an -i- in the following syllable (Proto-Germanic *fotiz), became productive in German, after this conditioning factor had beenlost <strong>and</strong> the umlaut came to be directly connected with the category <strong>of</strong> plural (e.g.H<strong>and</strong>—Hände ‘h<strong>and</strong>h<strong>and</strong>s’); in English, umlaut was not morphologized; there remainedonly a few isolated cases (see above <strong>and</strong>, e.g. mouse: mice).ReferencesBybee, J. 1985. Morphology: a study <strong>of</strong> the relation between meaning <strong>and</strong> form. Amsterdam.Dressler, W.U. 1985. Morphology: the dynamics <strong>of</strong> derivation. Ann Arbor. MI.Klausenburger J. 1979. Morphologization: studies in Latin <strong>and</strong> Romance morphophonology.Tübingen.Maiden, M. 1991. Interactive morphology. London.Wurzel, W. 1984. Flexionsmorphologie und Natürlichkeit. Berlin.grammaticalization, morphophonemics, natural phonologymorphologyTerm coined by J.W.von Goethe to designate the study <strong>of</strong> form <strong>and</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> livingorganisms which was taken up by linguistics in the nineteenth century as a cover term forinflection <strong>and</strong> word formation. In school grammar, morphology corresponds to thestudy <strong>of</strong> forms, i.e. the subdisciplines <strong>of</strong> inflection as well as <strong>of</strong> the study <strong>of</strong> word classes<strong>and</strong> their classificational criteria. In various ways word formation is treated as anindependent discipline beside morphology or as a further subdiscipline <strong>of</strong> morphology.Hockett (1954) distinguishes between three types <strong>of</strong> morphological models: (a) the item<strong>and</strong>-arrangementgrammar (=combinatory morphology) pursued in Americanstructuralism with consideration to distribution; (b) the concept <strong>of</strong> an item-<strong>and</strong>processgrammar (=process morphology) which is fundamental to generative grammar<strong>and</strong> in which basic abstract forms are transformed into their surface structure forms; <strong>and</strong>(c) the word-<strong>and</strong>-paradigm model (=paradigm morphology), which posits not themorpheme, but the word as the basic element <strong>of</strong> morphological description. The basicconcepts <strong>of</strong> morphology in recent linguistics were developed in the framework <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!