13.07.2015 Views

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A-Z 1027SantaliMundaSapir-Whorf hypothesis (also linguisticdeterminism, linguistic relativity)Hypothesis developed by B.L.Whorf (1897–1941) <strong>and</strong> based on the linguistic approach<strong>of</strong> his teacher, E.Sapir (1884–1939), which, in its strongest form claims that a languagedetermines the thought <strong>and</strong> perception <strong>of</strong> its speakers. Whorf himself called this view the‘linguistic relativity principle.’ In other words, just as time, space, <strong>and</strong> mass (according toEinstein) can be defined only in terms <strong>of</strong> a system <strong>of</strong> relationships, human knowledgesimilarly arises only in relation to the semantic <strong>and</strong> structural possibilities <strong>of</strong> naturallanguages. Through his work with Native American languages, whose vocabularies <strong>and</strong>grammatical structures deviate considerably from the regularities <strong>of</strong> Indo-Europeanlanguages, Whorf came to the conclusion that ‘people who use languages with verydifferent grammars are led by these grammars to typically different observations <strong>and</strong>different values for outwardly similar observations’ (Whorf 1956:20). Whorf s maininterest at the time was the Hopi language <strong>and</strong> culture. He worked especially with thelinguistic channels for space-time conceptualization in Hopi, with plural formation <strong>and</strong>peculiarities <strong>of</strong> counting, <strong>and</strong> from these observations derived the hypothesis that Hopihas no physical concept <strong>of</strong> time. The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis st<strong>and</strong>s in accord with vonHumboldt’s theory <strong>of</strong> a ‘world view’ <strong>of</strong> languages, as is clearly seen in the title <strong>of</strong> hiswork on the Kawi languages <strong>of</strong> Java: On language: the diversity <strong>of</strong> human languagestructure<strong>and</strong> its influence on the mental development <strong>of</strong> mankind. However, Sapir <strong>and</strong>Whorf make no explicit reference either to von Humboldt or to contemporary parallelviews. The continuing discussion <strong>of</strong> the function <strong>of</strong> language in cognitive processes tendsincreasingly towards assuming a reciprocal relationship between language <strong>and</strong> thought.For refutation <strong>of</strong> the strong form <strong>of</strong> this hypothesis, see Berlin, Berlin <strong>and</strong> Kay (1969).ReferencesBerlin, B., E.A.Berlin, <strong>and</strong> P.Kay. 1969. Basic color terms: their universality <strong>and</strong> evolution .Berkeley, CA.Gipper, H. 1972. Gibt es ein sprachliches Relativitätsprinzip? Untersuchungen zur Sapir-WhorfHypothese. Frankfurt.Grace, G.W. 1987. The linguistic construction <strong>of</strong> reality. London.Humboldt, W.von. 1836–9. Über die Kawi-Sprache auf der Insel Java, nebst einer Einleitung überdie Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren auf die geistigeEntwicklung des Menschengeschlechts, 3 vols. Berlin. (On language: the diversity <strong>of</strong> humanlanguage structure <strong>and</strong> its influen ce on e mental th development <strong>of</strong> mankind, trans. P.Heath.New York, 1988.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!