13.07.2015 Views

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Dictionary</strong> <strong>of</strong> language <strong>and</strong> linguistics 1016ReferenceVennemann, T. 1986. Rückumlaut. In D.Kastovsky et al. (eds), <strong>Linguistics</strong> across historical <strong>and</strong>geographical boundaries. Berlin. 701–23.ruleBasic term in the natural sciences, social sciences, <strong>and</strong> humanities as well as in variouslinguistic schools used to describe, explain, or regulate behavior. Depending on thecontext, the term can be used to describe such varying concepts as norms, (universal)rules <strong>of</strong> conduct, formal procedures in calculus or natural laws. In the framework <strong>of</strong>linguistics, the following interpretations can be established. (a) In school grammar. ruleshave the intention <strong>of</strong> being normative; actually, they are descriptions <strong>of</strong> regularities <strong>and</strong>exceptions based on selected examples whereby one is forced to call on readers <strong>and</strong>speakers to use their intelligence <strong>and</strong> linguistic intuition to fill in holes left by thesometimes vague formulations. (b) In descriptive linguistics, rules are descriptions <strong>of</strong>regularities that can be empirically observed; they do not have the same normative natureas rules in (a) above, but are still based on a static conception <strong>of</strong> rule. (c) In contrast tothe static underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> rule outlined above, transformational grammar uses adynamic underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> rule to describe linguistic competence. It refers to a productionprocess <strong>and</strong> is an explicit indication <strong>of</strong> formal operations that are carried out. Fortechnical details, phrase structure rules, recursive rule, transformation. (d) Basedon Wittgenstein’s underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> meaning, a theoretical underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> rule orientedaround language as act has developed in the framework <strong>of</strong> semantics <strong>and</strong> pragmaticssince the beginning <strong>of</strong> the 1970s, which sees language as rule-derived (social) behavior.See J.R. Searle’s distinction between constitutive <strong>and</strong> regulative rules.ReferencesChomsky, N. 1961. On the notion <strong>of</strong> ‘rule <strong>of</strong> grammar.’ In R.Jakobson (ed.), Structure <strong>of</strong> language<strong>and</strong> its mathematical aspects. Providence, RI. 255–7.——1980. Rules <strong>and</strong> representations. New York.Gumb, R.D. 1972. Rule governed linguistic behavior. The Hague.Heringer, H.J. (ed.) 1974. Seminar: der Regelbegriff in der praktischen Semantik. Frankfurt.Wheatley, J. 1970. <strong>Language</strong> <strong>and</strong> rules. The Hague.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!