13.07.2015 Views

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A-Z 285deglutinationaphesisdegree (also comparison, gradation)All constructions which express a comparison properly fall under the category <strong>of</strong> degree;it generally refers to a morphological category <strong>of</strong> adjectives <strong>and</strong> adverbs that indicates acomparative degree or comparison to some quantity. There are three levels <strong>of</strong> degree: (a)positive, or basic level <strong>of</strong> degree: The hamburgers tasted good; (b) comparative, whichmarks an inequality <strong>of</strong> two states <strong>of</strong> affairs relative to a certain characteristic: The steakswere better than the hamburgers; (c) superlative, which marks the highest degree <strong>of</strong>some quantity: The potato salad was the best <strong>of</strong> all; (d) cf. elative (absolute superlative),which marks a very high degree <strong>of</strong> some property without comparison to some other state<strong>of</strong> affairs: The performance was most impressive ( equative).Degree is not grammaticalized in all languages through the use <strong>of</strong> systematicmorphological changes; where such formal means are not present, lexical paraphrases areused to mark gradation. In modern Indo-European languages, degree is expressed either(a) synthetically by means <strong>of</strong> suffixation (new: newer: (the) newest); (b) analytically bymeans <strong>of</strong> particles (anxious’. more/most anxious); or (c) through suppletion (suppletivism), i.e. the use <strong>of</strong> different word stems: good: better: (the) best.ReferencesHellan, L. 1981. Towards an integrated analysis <strong>of</strong> comparatives. Tübingen.Klein, E. 1980. A semantics for positive <strong>and</strong> comparative adjectives. Ling&P 4. 1–45.Pinkham, C. 1982. The formation <strong>of</strong> comparative classes. Dissertation, Bloomington, IN.Stassen, L. 1985. Comparison <strong>and</strong> universal grammar. Oxford.Von Stechow, A. 1984. Comparing semantic theories <strong>of</strong> comparison. JoS 3. 1–77.deictic expression [Grk deiknýnai ‘to show’](also indexical expression)Term adopted by C.S. Peirce from formal logic for linguistic expressions that refer to thepersonal, temporal, or spatial aspect <strong>of</strong> any given utterance act <strong>and</strong> whose designation istherefore dependent on the context <strong>of</strong> the speech situation. Among the many differentkinds <strong>of</strong> deictic expressions are the personal pronouns (I, you, etc.), adverbial expressions(here, there, etc.), <strong>and</strong> the demonstrative pronouns (this, that, etc.). In contrast to propernames ( proper nouns) <strong>and</strong> definite descriptions, which refer to real objects <strong>and</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!