13.07.2015 Views

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A-Z 343ReferencesaspectDutchGermanic language which developed from West Low Franconian <strong>and</strong> has two historicaldialect variants: Flemish (south) <strong>and</strong> Dutch (north). Dutch is the <strong>of</strong>ficial language(approx. 20 million speakers) <strong>of</strong> the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> its overseas territories <strong>and</strong> is thesecond <strong>of</strong>ficial language <strong>of</strong> Belgium next to French. Afrikaans, which developed fromseventeenth-century dialects, is now an independent language. The oldest literaryattestations (Middle Dutch) date from 1150 in the area <strong>of</strong> Limburg-Brabant (Henric vanFeldeke). Since the seventeenth century the dialect <strong>of</strong> Amsterdam has been consideredthe written norm (e.g. the <strong>of</strong>ficial Bible translation <strong>of</strong> the Statenbijebel, 1626–37), whileDutch is spoken in the south only as the dialect variant ‘Flemish.’ With the signing <strong>of</strong> theNederl<strong>and</strong>se Taalunie (Netherl<strong>and</strong>ic <strong>Language</strong> Union, 1980) century-long attempts atunifying the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Belgium were <strong>of</strong>ficially recognized.In its older forms, Dutch was not much farther removed from High German than LowGerman, <strong>and</strong> still today shows marked similarities to German, though it has preserved anumber <strong>of</strong> archaic forms in its lexicon (cf. oorlog ‘war’ vs Ger. Krieg, geheugen‘memory’ vs Ger. Gedächtnis, eeuw ‘century’ vs Ger. Jahrhundert). The nominalinflectional system <strong>of</strong> Dutch is much more reduced than that <strong>of</strong> German.ReferencesBooij, G. 1995. The phonology <strong>of</strong> Dutch. Oxford.Brachin, P. 1987. Die niederländische Sprache. Hamburg.Devleeschouwer, J. 1981. Het ontstaan der Nederl<strong>and</strong>se Franse taalgrens. Naamkunde 13. 188–225.Geerts, G. 1987. Dutch reference grammar, 3rd edn. Leiden.Overdiep, G.S. 1949. Stilistische Grammatica van het moderne Nederl<strong>and</strong>s, 2nd edn. Zwolle.Shetter, W.Z. 1994. Dutch: an essential grammar. London.Van Haeringen, C.B. 1960. Netherl<strong>and</strong>ic language research: men <strong>and</strong> works in the study <strong>of</strong> Dutch,2nd edn. Leiden.Van Loey, A. 1970. Schoenfeld’s Historische Grammatica van het Nederl<strong>and</strong>s, 8th edn. Zutphen.HistoryDonaldson, B.C. 1983. Dutch: a linguistic history <strong>of</strong> Holl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Belgium. Leiden.Franck, J. 1910. Mittelniederl<strong>and</strong>ische Grammatik. Arnhem. (Repr. 1976.)Van Kerckvoorde, C.M. 1993. An introduction to Middle Dutch. Berlin <strong>and</strong> New York.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!