13.07.2015 Views

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Dictionary</strong> <strong>of</strong> language <strong>and</strong> linguistics 222ReferencesAllen, M. 1978. Morphological investigations. Dis-sertation, University <strong>of</strong> Connecticut.Bauer, L. 1983. English word formation. London.Brekle, H.E. 1978. Reflections on the conditions for the coining, use <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> nominalcompounds. In W.Dressler <strong>and</strong> W.Meid (eds), Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the twelfth InternationalCongress <strong>of</strong> <strong>Linguistics</strong>. Innsbruck. 68–77.Di Sciullo, A.M. <strong>and</strong> E.Williams. 1987. On the definition <strong>of</strong> words. Cambridge, MA.Downing, P. 1977. On the creation <strong>and</strong> use <strong>of</strong> English compound nouns. Lg 53. 810–42.Fabb, N. 1984. Syntactic affixation. Dissertation, MIT.Grimm, J. 1826. Deutsche Grammatik, vol. 2. Göttingen.Meyer, R. 1993. Compound comprehension in isolation <strong>and</strong> in context. Tübingen.Roeper, T. <strong>and</strong> M.Siegel. 1978. A lexical transformation for verbal compounds. LingI 9. 199–260.Selkirk, E. 1982. The syntax <strong>of</strong> words. Cambridge.Sproat, R. 1985. On deriving the lexicon. Dissertation, MIT.word formationcompositionality <strong>of</strong> meaningcompositionalityprinciple <strong>of</strong>compoundResult <strong>of</strong> the process <strong>of</strong> word formation <strong>of</strong> composition, a linguistic expression thatconsists <strong>of</strong> at least two free morphemes or morpheme constructions: bath+room,refrigeration (+) mechanic. The normal pattern <strong>of</strong> intonation in English is primary stressfollowed by secondary stress (as opposed to main stress <strong>and</strong> zero stress in multielemental‘simple’ compounds: youngster. In determinative compounds with asubordinate relation between the constituents (determining word, base word), the ordercannot be changed without changing the meaning (dance step vs step dance). Inprinciple, the relation <strong>of</strong> co-ordination between constituents <strong>of</strong> a copulative compositionallows free word order (owner-operator, operator-owner), though some forms quicklybecome lexicalized ( lexicalization) in one order or another: child prodigy vs*prodigy child or chief editor vs *editor chief, in which the first elements have becomevirtually adjectival. Compounding is syntactically <strong>and</strong> semantically differentiated fromsimple word groupings: <strong>of</strong>ten, though not necessarily, written as a single word, generallywith the primary stress on the first constituent, e.g. bookworm; set order, e.g. childpsychology vs the psychology <strong>of</strong> children; inflection only on the base word, e.g. textbook(pl. textbooks), openness <strong>of</strong> the semantic relation between the individual elements, e.g.paper trail (‘trail on which paper moves,’ ‘trail <strong>of</strong> paper’) <strong>and</strong> the lexicalized idiom, e.g.paper trail (‘documental evidence’). The junction between the two immediateconstituents may be characterized by a special linking morpheme. To the extent that its

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!