13.07.2015 Views

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A-Z 959proportional analogyanalogyproportional clauseSemantically defined modal clause functioning as an adverbial modifier to indicate adependency relationship proportional to the state <strong>of</strong> affairs expressed in the main clause.They are introduced by the+comparative in both the dependent <strong>and</strong> independent clauses:The closer they came to the city, the more excited they became.proportional oppositionoppositionproposition [Lat. propositio ‘statement <strong>of</strong> thefacts or substance <strong>of</strong> a case’]Term adopted by semantics <strong>and</strong> speech act theory from philosophy <strong>and</strong> formal logic(where a proposition is usually designated by ‘that p’). By ‘proposition’ one usuallyunderst<strong>and</strong>s the language-independent common denominator <strong>of</strong> the meaning <strong>of</strong> sentenceswhich express the factuality <strong>of</strong> a given state <strong>of</strong> affairs. In appropriate utterances <strong>of</strong> thesentences Phil smokes habitually. /Does Phil really smoke habitually? /It is not true thatPhil smokes habitually. /If Phil smokes habitually, then he will not live much longer,every time the same reference (i.e. to Phil) <strong>and</strong> the same predication (i.e. <strong>of</strong> habitualsmoking) is made, quite independent <strong>of</strong> the illocutionary force (assertion, question,denial, etc.). Thus, a proposition is the semantic kernel <strong>of</strong> a sentence that determines itstruth conditions, regardless <strong>of</strong> the syntactic form <strong>and</strong> lexical filling <strong>of</strong> the given form <strong>of</strong>expression. A distinction is drawn between ‘coarser’ concepts <strong>of</strong> proposition, accordingto which, for example, all logically true sentences denote the same proposition, <strong>and</strong>‘finer’ concepts <strong>of</strong> proposition, in which this is not the case. While older semantic models(cf. possible world semantics) conceived <strong>of</strong> propositions as unstructured units, the needfor a structured concept <strong>of</strong> proposition in linguistics is now more <strong>and</strong> more accepted (cf.situation semantics). Since propositional acts (i.e. acts <strong>of</strong> expressing a proposition) arealways constituents <strong>of</strong> illocutionary acts (illocution) <strong>and</strong> therefore cannot occurindependently, they must be distinguished from statements (i.e. illocutionary acts) inwhich propositions are asserted <strong>and</strong> not just expressed.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!