13.07.2015 Views

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Dictionary</strong> <strong>of</strong> language <strong>and</strong> linguistics 1076composed <strong>of</strong> a limited set <strong>of</strong> sublexical units (‘aspects’ according to Stokoe 1960;‘parameters’ according to Klima <strong>and</strong> Bellugi 1979). Whereas the early studiesemphasized that the visual/ gestural modality allows for extensive simultaneous as wellas sequential production <strong>of</strong> sublexical elements, more recent research, usingautosegmental or hierarchical syllable frameworks, has emphasized the sequentialarrangement at the phonological level. (Liddell <strong>and</strong> Johnson 1989; S<strong>and</strong>ler 1990; Wilbur1990; Coulter 1993). Several different notation systems have been developed forsublexical components (Stokoe et al. 1965; Prillwitz <strong>and</strong> Zienert 1990; McIntire et al.1987).An unusual characteristic <strong>of</strong> this visual language is the grammatical use <strong>of</strong> the threedimensionalspace around the signer (see Engberg-Pedersen 1993; Lucas 1990). Signalsgiven by the facial expression, head, trunk, <strong>and</strong> eye gaze have also been found to functionlinguistically (Baker-Shenk 1983; Liddell 1980; Bergman 1984). The mouthing <strong>of</strong> wordlikeelements from the spoken language has been reported to be an important loanelement in several European sign languages (see Schermer 1990; Ebbinghaus <strong>and</strong>Hessmann 1990).All sign languages studied to date have been found to have a rich morphology.Different groups <strong>of</strong> verbs can mark subject-object agreement, locative relations, path <strong>and</strong>manner <strong>of</strong> motion, <strong>and</strong> several kinds <strong>of</strong> temporal aspect (Padden 1988a; Klima & Bellugi1979; Bergman & Dahl 1990; Supalla 1982; Newport 1988). Engberg-Pedersen (1993)describes verbs in Danish Sign <strong>Language</strong> in terms <strong>of</strong> being more or less ‘polymorphemic’<strong>and</strong> temporal relations expressed by means <strong>of</strong> several different kinds <strong>of</strong> ‘time lines.’Derivational processes for adjectives, verbs, <strong>and</strong> nouns have been studied (Klima <strong>and</strong>Bellugi 1979; Bellugi <strong>and</strong> Newkirk 1981). Syntactical issues have been addressed forAmerican Sign <strong>Language</strong> (Liddell 1980; Padden 1988a; Fischer <strong>and</strong> Siple 1990; Lucas1990) <strong>and</strong> other sign languages (Brennan <strong>and</strong> Turner 1994). Several forms <strong>of</strong> ‘contactsigning’ (Lucas <strong>and</strong> Valli 1989) are used in communicative situations involving deaf orhearing persons bilingual in both a signed <strong>and</strong> an oral language (Ahlgren <strong>and</strong> Hyltenstam1994). Signs used simultaneously with spoken language in educational situations are notconsidered a form <strong>of</strong> deaf sign language but rather a pedagogical system for making theoral language more ‘visible’ to deaf children (Wilbur 1979). Non-verbal communication<strong>of</strong> signers has been studied by Reilly et al. (1990; 1992).Deaf children exposed to the language from infancy acquire sign language at a rate<strong>and</strong> through a process similar to their hearing peers’ acquisition <strong>of</strong> spoken language(Volterra <strong>and</strong> Erting 1990; Newport <strong>and</strong> Meier 1985). Sign language is considered bydeaf persons to be a core characteristic <strong>of</strong> Deaf culture (Padden <strong>and</strong> Humphries 1988).American Sign Lan guage has been accepted as fulfilling the foreign-languagerequirement in many US universities (Wilcox 1992). An extensive internationalbibliography <strong>of</strong> research on sign language can be found in Joachim <strong>and</strong> Prillwitz (1993).ReferencesAhlgren, I. <strong>and</strong> K.Hyltenstam (eds) 1994. Bilingualism in deaf education. Hamburg.Baker-Shenk, C.L. 1983. A microanalysis <strong>of</strong> the nonmanual components <strong>of</strong> questions in AmericanSign <strong>Language</strong>. Unpublished dissertation, University <strong>of</strong> California, Berkeley.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!