13.07.2015 Views

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A-Z 51American EnglishEnglishAmerican Sign <strong>Language</strong> (abbrev. ASL)sign languageAmerican structuralism (also post-Bloomfieldian linguistics)General term for variously developed branches <strong>of</strong> structuralism pioneered above all byE.Sapir (1884–1939) <strong>and</strong> L.Bloomfield (1887–1949). Although the various schoolscannot be clearly distinguished from one another, a distinction is made between twogeneral phases: the so-called ‘Bloomfield Era,’ <strong>and</strong> distributionalism, with Z.Harris aschief representative. Common to all branches are certain scientific prerequisites whichdecisively influenced the specific methodological orientation <strong>of</strong> American structuralism.At first. an interest in dying Native American languages brought about interdisciplinaryresearch in linguistics <strong>and</strong> anthropology. The occupation with culturally distant <strong>and</strong> as yetcompletely unresearched languages, which existed only orally, was a significant catalystfor the paroleoriented, purely descriptive methods <strong>of</strong> American structuralism ( languevs parole). The works <strong>of</strong> E.Sapir <strong>and</strong> F.Boas are significant ( also field work). Thetheoretical <strong>and</strong> methodological format came to be determined in large part by theprinciples <strong>of</strong> behaviorist psychology ( behaviorism). Following the natural sciences,this direction <strong>of</strong> research reduces the object <strong>of</strong> its investigation to sensorally perceptibledata <strong>and</strong> draws on observations made in animal experiments to explain human behavior.This restriction to an exact analysis <strong>of</strong> objectively experienced data meant that theproblem <strong>of</strong> meaning was deemed an extralinguistic phenomenon, whereas phonology<strong>and</strong> grammar were subject to a strictly formal analysis, based on the discoveryprocedures <strong>of</strong> segmentation <strong>and</strong> classification. Methodologically, Americanstructuralism is characterized by empirical ( empiricism) <strong>and</strong> inductive procedures, inwhich only the identification <strong>and</strong> arrangement <strong>of</strong> linguistic elements are relevant forgrammatical description. ( also antimentalism, descriptive linguistics, item-<strong>and</strong>arrangementgrammar)ReferencesBloch, B. 1942. Outline <strong>of</strong> linguistic analysis. Baltimore, MD.Bloomfield, L. 1926. A set <strong>of</strong> postulates for the science <strong>of</strong> language. Lg 2. 153–64.——1933. <strong>Language</strong>. New York.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!