09.12.2012 Views

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

142<br />

antecedent of effective team performance, and communication becomes more difficult when<br />

teams are dispersed.<br />

Indeed, previous research has suggested that the most important aspects of collaboration<br />

may be these intertwined issues of communication and shared mental models of the combat<br />

situation (Schrage, 1990). Collaboration helps create shared meaning about a situation, and this<br />

shared meaning is important for effective decision-making performance. At the same time,<br />

some prior shared situational awareness is essential for effective communication, and<br />

communication is crucial in maintaining and refining that shared awareness. We designed our<br />

research program with these complexities in mind.<br />

We selected the game SCUDHunt for our research on collaboration precisely because it<br />

provides a simplified model of this interplay of shared awareness and communication, while<br />

permitting independent manipulation of variables thought to affect them. SCUDHunt requires<br />

participants to (1) collaborate from distributed locations and (2) share unique information from<br />

their intelligence assets for optimal game performance. The goal of the game is simple, to locate<br />

three SCUD missile launchers on a map. To accomplish this, separated but communicating<br />

players use a computer mouse to deploy information gathering "assets" across the map they share<br />

on their computer screens. Players get five "turns" during which they can gather and accumulate<br />

that information regarding launcher locations. The game thus requires players to execute digital<br />

tasks in order to achieve a shared goal, while performing their different tasks in geographically<br />

separate locations.<br />

Our research began with a cognitive task analysis of this game to identify critical points<br />

where collaboration would be beneficial.* These are points where players need to communicate<br />

planning strategies and to share gathered information in order to perform effectively. The general<br />

collaboration areas identified were:<br />

Coordinating deploying: This is the discussion among players of where best to place their<br />

assets on the map grid, with the goals of (1) maximizing coverage of the area remaining to<br />

be searched, and (2) using certain assets to verify the results of earlier searches;<br />

Interpreting results: This is the discussion among players of the reliability of reports from<br />

different intelligence-gathering assets, leading to a determination of the likelihood that a<br />

SCUD launcher is at any particular location. This involves interpretation of results from the<br />

current turn, as well as integration of findings from previous searches.<br />

____________<br />

* Ross, K.G. (September, <strong>2003</strong>). Perspectives on Studying Collaboration in Distributed<br />

Networks, Contractor Report prepared for the U. S. Army Research Institute for the<br />

Behavioral and Social Sciences by Klein Associates Inc., Fairborn, Ohio, under<br />

Contract PO DASW01-02-P-0526.<br />

45 th Annual Conference of the <strong>International</strong> <strong>Military</strong> <strong>Testing</strong> <strong>Association</strong><br />

Pensacola, Florida, 3-6 November <strong>2003</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!