09.12.2012 Views

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

suggest that applicants ‘rule out’ jobs located outside their preferred geographic area, and that the<br />

importance of location is not limited to low-level employees (e.g., Barber & Roehling, 1993;<br />

Osborn, 1993; Rynes & Lawler, 1983). In a related vein, research on job pursuit has indicated<br />

that the need to relocate plays an important role in decisions about accepting job offers (Brett,<br />

1982; Brett & Reilly, 1988; Gould & Penley, 1985; Noe & Barber, 1993; Noe, Steffy, & Barber,<br />

1988). Ryan et al. (2000) found that applicants withdrawing from the hiring process expressed a<br />

greater need to relocate than those who continued in the process.<br />

Objective factors: The role of job attributes. There is ample evidence suggesting that objective<br />

job attributes, such as pay, working conditions, nature of the work, influence applicant job pursuit<br />

and job acceptance (for a review see Turban et al., 1993). Evidence from field studies on RJPs<br />

suggests that applicants are more likely to reject jobs when presented with negative information<br />

on the job (e.g., Premack & Wanous, 1985; Suszko & Breaugh, 1986; Wiesner et al., 1991).<br />

Ryan et al. (2000) examined the relationship between withdrawing from a selection process and<br />

job attribute perceptions. Contrary to expectations, perceptions of job attributes were unrelated to<br />

withdrawal, and job attributes were generally positive. From these findings, she concluded that<br />

screening of jobs on attributes occurs prior to application. This conclusion has important<br />

implications for the military that has a tradition of informing prospective applicants on<br />

organizational characteristics and career possibilities within the military prior to application.<br />

Subjective factors: ‘Fit’. Schmit and Ryan (1997) found that a number of applicants withdrew<br />

because of perceptions of a lack of job and organization fit. Some were of the opinion that the<br />

job was not right for them; others argued – rightfully or wrongfully – that they did not have the<br />

required qualifications for the job. Previous research (see Kristof, 1996 for a review) has<br />

repeatedly demonstrated that applicants are more attracted to organizations that best fit their<br />

personal characteristics. That is, applicants are more attracted to organizations that best fit their<br />

individual values (e.g., Cable & Judge, 1996; Chatman, 1989, 1991; Judge & Bretz, 1992; Judge<br />

& Cable, 1997; O’Reilly, Chatman, & Caldwell, 1991; Posner, 1992), goals (e.g., Pervin, 1989;<br />

Vancouver, Millsap, & Peters, 1994; Vancouver & Schmitt, 1991; Witt & Nye, 1992), needs<br />

(Bretz, Ash, & Dreher, 1989; Bretz & Judge, 1994; Cable & Judge, 1994; Turban & Keon, 1993),<br />

and personality (Burke & Deszca, 1982; Slaughter et al., 2001; Tom, 1971). Although<br />

organizational attraction and self-selection are not synonymous (Wanous and Colella, 1989), it is<br />

reasonable to assume that fit perceptions will also have an influence on self-selection.<br />

Commitment to obtaining the job. Results from previous research suggest that career<br />

commitment, or motivation to work in a particular profession, has a strong negative relation with<br />

intentions to withdraw from a career (Blau, 1985; Carson & Bedeian, 1994). Utilizing social<br />

identity theory, Mael and Ashforth (1995) demonstrated that identification with the military may<br />

occur even prior to enlistment, and that this sense of professional identity relates negatively to<br />

turnover soon after hire. Therefore, it can be expected that individuals who are more committed<br />

to obtaining the job are more likely to remain in the process (Ryan et al., 2000).<br />

Impression of the organization. According to Barber (1998) “real-world applicants do not start<br />

out as “blank slates” from a recruitment standpoint; rather, they often have some impression of<br />

employing organizations even before they are exposed to recruitment materials. These general<br />

impressions have been referred to as organizational images and are expected to be related to the<br />

organization’s ability to attract applicants (e.g., Fombrun & Shanley, 1990; Stigler, 1962)” (p.<br />

32). Gatewood, Gowan, and Lautenschlager (1993) found that an applicant’s decision to pursue<br />

contact with the organization was influenced by its corporate and recruitment image. Turban and<br />

Greening (1997) demonstrated that corporate social performance (i.e., the organization’s<br />

tendency to act responsible in dealing with employees, customers, and the community) is related<br />

385<br />

45 th Annual Conference of the <strong>International</strong> <strong>Military</strong> <strong>Testing</strong> <strong>Association</strong><br />

Pensacola, Florida, 3-6 November <strong>2003</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!