09.12.2012 Views

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

384<br />

Social influence. People are unlikely to make organizational-relevant choices in a social vacuum.<br />

Yet, social influences were ignored in research on organizational choice for a long time. Kilduff<br />

(1990) noticed that “decision-making research has been generally silent concerning social<br />

influences on choices” (p. 270-271) and that “a good example of scholarly neglect of social<br />

influences on behavior occurs in the area of organizational choice” (p. 271). In his research on<br />

the interpersonal structure of decision making, Kilduff found the social network influenced<br />

individuals’ choices of organizations to interview with such that pairs of students who were either<br />

friends or who perceived each other as similar tended to make similar organizational choices,<br />

even if they had different academic concentrations and different job preferences. Similarly, there<br />

is a lot of evidence indicating that prospective applicants are more likely to acquire information<br />

about job vacancies through informal networks of friends, family and acquaintances than through<br />

official sources such as advertisements or employment offices (Granovetter, 1974; Reynolds,<br />

1951; Rynes et al., 1991; Schwab, Rynes, & Aldag, 1987). Liden and Parsons (1986) were<br />

among the first to suggest that parents and friends may have an important influence on job<br />

acceptance among job applicants. They found that these reference groups had even a larger<br />

impact on job acceptance intentions than general job affect. More recently, Turban (2001) found<br />

that the social context was related to potential applicants’ organizational attractiveness. More<br />

specifically, he found that perceptions of university personnel of a firm’s presence on campus and<br />

image as an employer were positively related to college students’ attraction to that firm. Legree<br />

et al. (2000) surveyed 2,731 young men and their parents about their attitudes and intentions<br />

toward the military to understand factors associated with military enlistment. The results from<br />

this study indicated that youth perceptions of parental attitudes toward the military significantly<br />

correlated with stated enlistment propensity, which predicted actual enlistment. Surprisingly,<br />

youth perceptions of parental attitudes were often inaccurate. With regard to applicant<br />

withdrawal, Ryan and McFarland (1997), and Ryan et al. (2000) found that family and friend<br />

support for pursuing a particular job had a significant relation to self-selection decisions.<br />

Applicants who self-selected out felt their families were less supportive for their careers. In their<br />

study, Schmitt and Ryan (1997) observed that more than 10% of applicants withdrew because<br />

they felt that the selection process or the job interfered with family obligations or with how the<br />

job was viewed by family members. There exists a clear parallel between these findings and<br />

recent developments in research on career choice. The social cognitive career theory (Lent,<br />

Brown, & Hackett, 1994), for instance, emphasizes that besides person and behavioral variables,<br />

contextual variables such as social supports and social barriers play a key role in the career choice<br />

process.<br />

Employment alternatives. Applicants may withdraw from the hiring process because the job<br />

opportunity has become less attractive to them relative to other options (Barber, 1998). Schmit<br />

and Ryan (1997) found that a large portion of those withdrawing from the hiring process did so<br />

because of perceived employment alternatives. In some cases, withdrawals believed they could<br />

get a better job or already had taken another offer. In other cases, one’s current job was seen as<br />

the better alternative. Ryan et al. (2000) also found that other alternatives were a major reason<br />

for withdrawing. These results are consistent with findings on the role of perceived employment<br />

alternatives in turnover behavior. Turnover experts long have argued that job opportunities may<br />

induce even satisfied employees into surrendering their current job (e.g., March & Simon, 1958;<br />

Mobley, Griffeth, Hand, & Meglino, 1979; Steel, 1996; Steel & Griffeth, 1989).<br />

Need to relocate. According to Noe and Barber (1993), relocation may have negative influences<br />

on one’s non-work life, requiring adjustments in housing, education, friendships, and activities by<br />

the relocated individuals and their families. Research on geographic boundaries in recruitment<br />

45 th Annual Conference of the <strong>International</strong> <strong>Military</strong> <strong>Testing</strong> <strong>Association</strong><br />

Pensacola, Florida, 3-6 November <strong>2003</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!