09.12.2012 Views

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

588<br />

To plan for future missions properly the commander needs to know the number of<br />

soldiers he will have and the skills they possess. This concept is called manning and is one of<br />

the most critical elements of war. The ultimate aim of a replacement system is to continue to<br />

man the force. The procedures used to achieve this aim have varied throughout history (FM<br />

12-6, 1994).<br />

Differing Operational Approaches<br />

The German divisions during World War II (WW II) were affiliated with a<br />

military district with the regiments within a division affiliated with a region within the<br />

military district. Replacement battalions were located within a region intending to have<br />

regimental replacements coming from the same German regions. This was very effective<br />

during the early stages of the war, but as the number of German divisions grew it became<br />

necessary to have replacement battalions provide replacements for divisions instead of<br />

regiments. The replacement battalions received the draftees and provided about two<br />

months of combat training, then after this initial training the replacements were either<br />

sent to the division to a replacement battalion or to receive additional training.<br />

The German division and regimental commanders were in charge of their<br />

replacement system rather than the Army command. This decentralized system fostered<br />

esprit de corps and great unit devotion, however, when certain units had mass casualties<br />

they had to be taken off the front lines, since not enough replacements were available<br />

from the affiliated region or military district. When this occurred the unit was sent to a<br />

recovery area behind the front lines, remaining there until enough sick and wounded<br />

soldiers returned or region and district draftees were assigned to the unit. Another<br />

approach used by the Germans was to take the remnants of a division and create new<br />

battalions. These battalions would then become part of another division, the regional<br />

integrity of the battalions being kept intact. Along with reducing the numbers of<br />

divisional battalions from the original nine to seven, these approaches allowed<br />

Germany to maintain nearly 300 divisions until the later stages of WW II.<br />

The British replacement system during WW II was similar to the German system<br />

in that it tried to keep regional ties whenever possible. The U.S. Army took a differing, if<br />

not opposite approach, to replacement operations, marking considerations as to how and<br />

why another approach was more acceptable. There was fear that if a particular unit lost a<br />

large number of men, it would have a dramatically negative impact on the regional<br />

morale. Another difference in replacement philosophy was the decision to keep the<br />

number of divisions relatively low. During WW II Henry L. Stimson, then Secretary of<br />

War, wanted the Army to have 200 divisions, whereas General George C. Marshall, the<br />

leading U.S. Army proponent, insisted on keeping the number much lower so that these<br />

would be an adequate replacement flow. Secretary Stimson ultimately gave way to<br />

General Marshall and they agreed that 90 divisions for the Army would be a manageable<br />

number. It was also thought a centralized system would be more efficient and as needs<br />

occur fill them quickly as possible without concern for trying to keep regional integrity.<br />

45 th Annual Conference of the <strong>International</strong> <strong>Military</strong> <strong>Testing</strong> <strong>Association</strong><br />

Pensacola, Florida, 3-6 November <strong>2003</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!