09.12.2012 Views

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DEVELOPING MEASURES OF OCCUPATIONAL INTERESTS AND<br />

VALUES FOR SELECTION 39<br />

Dan J. Putka, Ph.D.<br />

Human Resources Research Organization<br />

66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 400<br />

Alexandria, Va 22314<br />

Dputka@Humrro.Org<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Christopher E. Sager, Ph.D.<br />

Human Resources Research Organization<br />

66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 400<br />

Alexandria, Va 22314<br />

csager@humrro.org<br />

491<br />

Chad H. Van Iddekinge, Ph.D.<br />

Human Resources Research Organization<br />

66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 400<br />

Alexandria, Va 22314<br />

Cvaniddekinge@Hummro.Org<br />

Historically, personnel selection has concerned the development of predictor measures<br />

that assess knowledges, skills, and attributes (KSAs) deemed critical to successful job<br />

performance (e.g., Campbell, 1990; Schmitt & Chan, 1998). However, job performance is not the<br />

only criterion that the U. S. Army desires to affect through its selection and classification<br />

systems. Most notably, attrition is often a key criterion of interest. Unfortunately, traditional<br />

KSA-based predictor development strategies fall short in identifying predictors of nonperformance<br />

criteria. Fortunately, the academic literature provides alternative strategies for<br />

developing predictors that are well grounded in theory and highly relevant for the prediction of<br />

alternative criteria. For example, measures of occupational interests and values have a long<br />

tradition in vocational/career counseling literature, and have been found to be predictive of both<br />

employee turnover and several work-related attitudes that are believed to underlie turnover (e.g.,<br />

job satisfaction and commitment; Dawis, 1991). Although common in the vocational counseling<br />

arena, several challenges arise when such measures are considered for use in personnel selection<br />

where intentional response distortion among respondents becomes more likely. This paper<br />

discusses challenges that have arisen in our efforts to develop such measures for the Army’s<br />

Select21 project.<br />

INTEREST AND VALUE MEASURES IN SELECT21<br />

The goal of the Select21 project (sponsored by the U.S. Army Research Institute for the<br />

Behavioral and Social Sciences) is to develop and validate measures that will help the Army select<br />

and retain Soldiers with the characteristics needed to succeed in the future Army. A key element of<br />

predictor development has been to develop measures of person-environment (P-E) fit (Kristof,<br />

39 This paper is part of a symposium titled Occupational Interest Measurement: Where Are the Services Headed?<br />

presented at the <strong>2003</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>Military</strong> <strong>Testing</strong> <strong>Association</strong> Conference in Pensacola, FL (M.G. Rumsey,<br />

Chair). The views, opinions, and/or findings contained in this paper are those of the authors and should not be<br />

construed as an official U.S. Department of the Army position, policy, or decision.<br />

45 th Annual Conference of the <strong>International</strong> <strong>Military</strong> <strong>Testing</strong> <strong>Association</strong><br />

Pensacola, Florida, 3-6 November <strong>2003</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!