09.12.2012 Views

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the operational environment and, of both the immediate and long-range goals are what will<br />

ensure maximal SME effort.<br />

C. Participants should be advised that small-group processes will be used and that<br />

group dynamics training will be the first step in the process. Materials on "groupthink",<br />

group forming etc. should also be included in this package. At the first session, some group<br />

exercises should be conducted to demonstrate what the materials have described.<br />

D. Finally, the read-ahead package should include a homework assignment.<br />

Participants should be instructed to read all of the read-ahead package and then begin<br />

thinking and working on the first objective. A day-by-day agenda should be provided as<br />

well.<br />

NOTE: Along with the read-ahead, the facilitator must prepare a complete set of protocols<br />

for the participants to be given to them when they arrive. Besides having the read -ahead<br />

materials, the protocols also have the group processes materials and a step-by-step breakout<br />

of the objectives, sequencing and, how each objective will be carried out. The protocols are<br />

the structure to keep the groups on the process track.<br />

THE SEQUENTIAL PROCESS<br />

The optimum size of the workshop is 10 persons broken into 2 sub-groups of 5. Upon<br />

arrival each SMEs should be provided with a final agenda and the protocols that specify how<br />

each objective will be accomplished. The next step is to proceed with instructions and<br />

exercises in group dynamics and consensus. Work on the objectives can now begin. An<br />

iterative step-wise process should be used where each objective is accomplished by<br />

anonymous and individual means. Sub-group discussions are then held to achieve consensus.<br />

Finally, the intact (the 2 sub groups meet together) for a group discussion to achieve final<br />

consensus. The iterative, step-wise process it to go from a 5 person group meeting on subobjectives<br />

to an intact 10 person meeting to make a group decision on the main objective.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

One obvious candidate for the SGDP methodology is Operational <strong>Testing</strong> (OT). The<br />

goal of any OT is to determine the system’s capability to perform its mission in the<br />

operational setting and to determine and evaluate core operational effectiveness and<br />

suitability problems. The SGDP can be modified so that SMEs can use it in OT.<br />

A small set of carefully selected SMEs would be used to face-validate the existing scenarios.<br />

This SME set also would ensure that all the necessary operational issues were embedded in<br />

the scenarios. Dumas and Redish state, “a good scenario is short, composed in the user’s<br />

words (not the products), and is clear so all participants will understand it”. A second group<br />

of SMEs would also assist in the test sequencing as well as the techniques/scalings to be used<br />

in workload analysis. While the process of multiple SGDP workshops may seem lengthy, it<br />

is not the case. The Workshops would run consecutively, each new one beginning with the<br />

data from the prior one---and each SGDP workshop only would need approximately 4 days to<br />

complete. The experience and insight as to the realities of the operational arena of the SMEs<br />

are both needed and invaluable. Upon completion of the actual OT, all SME members of the<br />

2 previous SGDPs would be convened to interpret the results and to make a set of<br />

recommendations. These recommendations may include retrofit, modification, and training.<br />

The two SGDP groups would work independently at first. Then, as they finished, they would<br />

convene into one group to finalize their results.<br />

45 th Annual Conference of the <strong>International</strong> <strong>Military</strong> <strong>Testing</strong> <strong>Association</strong><br />

Pensacola, Florida, 3-6 November <strong>2003</strong><br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!