09.12.2012 Views

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Interviews<br />

GFD dichotomous was regressed on the results of both the physiological an<br />

professional interview scores, and on each of these variables separately. For the analysis four<br />

logistic regression methods were used: the Quasi-Newton method, the Simplex procedure, the<br />

Hooke-Jeeves Pattern Move and the Rosenbrock Pattern Search.<br />

There was no fit for the psychological and professional scores together, nor for the<br />

professional interview score apart. A logistic one-variable model containing the psychological<br />

interview score, in contrast, gave a good fit (χ² = 4.34; p = .03715).<br />

CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION<br />

The PCA yielded a five-component structure. The results gave furthermore evidence<br />

for predictive validity with regard to some tests used in the PS-battery and the Academic tests.<br />

The psychological interview score too proved to be promising in a predictive way. All of<br />

these findings will have to be cross-validated.<br />

The GFD12 was chosen because of its statistical and practical qualities. First, criterion<br />

data were available both in a continuous and a dichotomous form. Using the blue and green<br />

cards there was a spread in the values of the variable, ranging from zero to twelve and its<br />

distribution was fluent and approached the bell-curve. Therefore the criterion, operationalised<br />

in this way, could be treated as a continuous variable. A continuous variable offers some<br />

advantages compared to a dichotomised criterion (Hunter & Burke, 1995; Caretta and Ree,<br />

<strong>2003</strong>). Nevertheless, there were also data available on the criterion in a dichotomised form<br />

(passed or failed in the GFD). These data were very useful in case of violation of assumptions<br />

for linear techniques with regard to the predictors.<br />

Second, the criterion was an initial or intermediate criterion and not an ultimate one.<br />

Dover (1991) remarks that the more distant the criterion is, the lower the validity is. Hilton<br />

and Dolgin are in favour of initial training as a criterion for validity and say that an ultimate<br />

criterion is less cost-effective. Others, like Helmreich (see Hilton & Dolgan, 1991) say job<br />

performance is a more realistic criterion than initial training. No evidence has been found for<br />

predictivity in relation to the PM-battery. One of the reasons could be the censoring of the<br />

population or restriction in range (Caretta & Ree, <strong>2003</strong>). Applicants were selected mainly on<br />

the PM-composite score.<br />

There was no direct selection on the basis of the PS-score, the results of the PS-battery<br />

were used only as an indicator by the psychologist during the psychological interview. In the<br />

present study no corrections for range restriction were applied. In order to obtain a better view<br />

on the predictive value, results should be recalculated and corrected for restriction in range.<br />

An important issue in the Belgian context could be the existence of differences<br />

between scores in Flemish and Walloon trainees or applicants, and, of course, the differences<br />

between scores in males and females. Study of gender and ethnic group differences is<br />

important in evaluating measurement instruments. Caretta (1997) explains why.<br />

In the Belgian context there is a shortage of data on female trainees. Research on<br />

differences between Flemish and Walloon trainees is possible, but difficult, because of the<br />

small groups of trainees for both linguistic systems.<br />

Recent evolvements in pilot research indicate that it is important to test for multitasking<br />

capability. Second, personal and non-technical skills will become more important<br />

because of the increasing importance of teamwork in small teams in modern military aviation<br />

(Damitz, Manzey, Kleinmann & Severin, <strong>2003</strong>; Hanson, Hedge, Logan, Bruskiewicz,<br />

Borman, & Siem, 1996). In the near future a test for multi-tasking will be added to the<br />

783<br />

45 th Annual Conference of the <strong>International</strong> <strong>Military</strong> <strong>Testing</strong> <strong>Association</strong><br />

Pensacola, Florida, 3-6 November <strong>2003</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!