09.12.2012 Views

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

712<br />

Research has shown that making a leader aware of these discrepancies can facilitate the<br />

leader’s success (e.g., Becker, Ayman, & Korabik, 2002). Examining the agreement between<br />

subordinate and self-ratings of leaders in an actual upward feedback session, London and<br />

Wohlers (1991) found that leaders’ ability to accurately judge subordinates’ attitudes improved<br />

over time; one year after the initial feedback session, which included results from subordinates,<br />

agreement in ratings increased significantly, although not dramatically from Time 1 (r 2 = .28) to<br />

Time 2 (r 2 = .32). This supports the premise that discrepancies identified with the LCS could<br />

decrease over time if leaders were provided feedback on their accuracy. As the ultimate goal is<br />

to facilitate leaders’ ability to accurately judge the attitudes of their soldiers, the following<br />

hypotheses are offered:<br />

Hypothesis 4a. Discrepancies between leaders’ ratings of subordinate’s attitudes of<br />

climate dimensions and subordinates’ rating would reduce significantly across the four phases of<br />

administration.<br />

Hypothesis 4b. Confidence levels would vary significantly over the phases of<br />

administration. At Time 2 and 3, the confidence levels would initially be lowered (i.e., Phase 2)<br />

until leaders re-calibrate their assessments of climate, and then confidence levels would raise<br />

(e.g., Phase 4).<br />

RESULTS<br />

The Human Dimensions Operations (HDO) survey was administered throughout the<br />

course of an operational tour: a predeployment phase and three in-theatre phases. The HDO – W<br />

version, including the LCS was administered to 552 leaders (warrant officers and above) and,<br />

concurrently, the HDO – S version, including the UCP, was administered to 2,064 subordinates<br />

(sergeants and below). Results of the UCP were averaged for each climate dimension<br />

(i.e., appropriate items were summed and averaged for each construct). Participants’ resultant<br />

scores for each climate dimensions were merged with the LCP results. Demographic information<br />

such as company, platoon, rank, etc. was available for both data sets.<br />

Hypothesis 1. Previous findings that leaders overrated soldiers’ perceptions of climate<br />

(Brown & Johnston, 2002) were confirmed with eleven separate one-way ANOVAs (Tabachnick<br />

& Fidell, 2001). Results revealed significant differences between leaders and subordinates on all<br />

of the climate dimensions (refer to Figure 1), thereby supporting Hypothesis 1.<br />

45 th Annual Conference of the <strong>International</strong> <strong>Military</strong> <strong>Testing</strong> <strong>Association</strong><br />

Pensacola, Florida, 3-6 November <strong>2003</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!