09.12.2012 Views

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

24<br />

820 questionnaires done anonymously (coded) were sent to the private address of the<br />

professional military personnel. 420 questionnaires were sent to professional officers and 400 to<br />

professional non-commissioned officers. Both sample groups of addressees were of random<br />

choice. The return rate was 61% (n=499). 19 questionnaires had to be disregarded because they<br />

were insufficiently filled in, which means that there were a total of n=480 . The average age of<br />

the total sample was 42.5 years.<br />

Measures<br />

The job characteristics (skill variety, task identity, task significance, autonomy and<br />

feedback), satisfaction with salary and colleagues, perceived job security and leadership quality<br />

(context factors) as well as job satisfaction were registered with the German version (van Dick et<br />

al., 2001) of the “Job Diagnostic Survey” (JDS) by Hackman and Oldham (1975). The individual<br />

contents of job characteristics were integrated into one scale value as suggested by Hackman and<br />

Oldham. The respective items were put into a 6-point Scale.<br />

A German translation of the Organizational Commitment Questionnaire (OCQ) by Maier and<br />

Woschée (2002), was used to record the affective commitment. The range of the scale was from<br />

1 - 7. 4 items (scale 1-5) by Baillod (1992) were used to record the intention to quit.<br />

The Big 5 were recorded with the version MRS-30 by Schallberger and Venetz (1999). The<br />

respective scale consisted of six bi-polar pairs of adjectives as “vulnerable” – “sturdy” or<br />

“secure” – “insecure”. The test person had to indicate out in a 6-poit Scale how these adjectives<br />

applied to him.<br />

The reliability coefficients of the respective scales are shown in table 1. The context<br />

factors could not be established because the items were too small to calculate a coefficient.<br />

Results<br />

The internal consistency of the scales were sufficient to very good. With reference to the<br />

means it can be said that the variables job satisfaction (4.60) and job characteristics (4.44) were<br />

judged as satisfactory to good, but not the context factors with the exception of the variable<br />

satisfaction with colleagues. The variable affective commitment is lower than the variable job<br />

satisfaction because it was measured on a scale from 1-7. The 4.55 represents a rather low level<br />

of affective commitment. There was nothing conspicuous as to the means of the personality<br />

constructs.<br />

On the basis of the matrix it can be seen that there is a moderate to high connection but to<br />

a varying degree between job characteristics, context factors and the variables commitment, job<br />

satisfaction and intention to quit. The influence of the context factor satisfaction with colleagues<br />

is far less than that of other variables.<br />

M SD α 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12<br />

1 Job characteristics 4.60 .56 .84 -<br />

Context factors<br />

2 Job security 3.72 1.16 - .34 -<br />

3 Salary 3.60 1.20 - .24 .48 -<br />

4 Leadership 3.60 1.20 - .46 .48 .36 -<br />

5 Colleagues 4.60 .92 - .29 .04 -.03 .20 -<br />

Personality<br />

45 th Annual Conference of the <strong>International</strong> <strong>Military</strong> <strong>Testing</strong> <strong>Association</strong><br />

Pensacola, Florida, 3-6 November <strong>2003</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!