09.12.2012 Views

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Occupational Analytics<br />

Paul L. Jones<br />

Navy Manpower Analysis Center<br />

Jill Strange and Holly Osburn<br />

SkillsNET Corporation<br />

The U.S. Navy established the Navy Occupational Task Analysis Program (NOTAP)<br />

in 1976. Initially, the NOTAP used the Comprehensive Occupational Development and<br />

Analysis Program (CODAP) as the analytical software to produce occupational standards<br />

and to analyze the results from fleet surveys. Rising costs of production, Navy personnel<br />

downsizing, increased sophistication of technology, and requirements to more rapid<br />

production forced the Navy to identify alternative methods for maintaining its<br />

occupational structure. In 1988, the NOTAP replaced CODAP with Raosoft, Inc.<br />

because it enabled the Navy to collect data using diskettes (heretofore, we used printed<br />

booklets.) In 2001, the NOTAP replaced Raosoft with the SkillsNET on-line<br />

methodology that permits our occupational classification structure needs to be met from a<br />

web-enabled environment.<br />

NOTAP was challenged to rework the classification structure to provide increased<br />

characterizations of the work and have “the ability to conduct what-if scenario’s for a<br />

changing littoral operation.” Adoption of the SkillsNET methodology provides greater<br />

flexibility in occupational structures, while moving the Navy into a multifaceted<br />

environment where the analytical possibilities are virtually unlimited. This paper focuses<br />

on several analytical vistas available to Navy decision makers and leadership.<br />

Similarity of Jobs<br />

The SkillObject, a cluster of similar tasks, becomes the focus around which similarity<br />

of Jobs – tasks, knowledge, skills, and abilities – is determined. Similarity knowledge<br />

allows the Navy to realize cost savings, common training delivery, and it eliminates<br />

redundancy. Similarity is calculated using scaled skills, scaled abilities, percentage of<br />

overlap for tools and knowledge categories.<br />

Job Transfer<br />

The Navy has a major problem with Sea-Shore rotation of personnel. It is difficult to<br />

place individuals in a shore billet where his/her sea skill requirements are maintained or<br />

strengthened. Reality tells us basic skills have historically eroded.<br />

Transferability measures enable us to dissect the job at sea and place individuals in shore<br />

billets where a portion of their skills are maintained. This enables us to eliminate<br />

expensive retooling.<br />

Transferability is a function of criticality, consequence of error between the targeted<br />

shore job and the sea requirement, and Importance.<br />

505<br />

45 th Annual Conference of the <strong>International</strong> <strong>Military</strong> <strong>Testing</strong> <strong>Association</strong><br />

Pensacola, Florida, 3-6 November <strong>2003</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!