09.12.2012 Views

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AIR’s past experienced in the IC enabled us to support this requirement based on<br />

previous occupational analysis (and other work) at three of the major agencies: the National<br />

Security Agency (NSA), the Defense Intelligence Agency, and the National Mapping and<br />

Imagery Agency (NIMA).<br />

Background<br />

In the mid-1990’s, IC member agencies were responding to radical changes in US threats<br />

and, as a result, Agency missions began to change. For example, the primary threat of fighting<br />

conventional wars against the former Soviet bloc vanished. The necessity of fighting low<br />

intensity conflicts became apparent. Both of these factors led to a questioning of whether the<br />

IC had the necessary blend of skills and abilities to carry out new missions. An additional<br />

challenge was the significant societal pressure to continuously improve efficiency and quality<br />

(for example, see General Accounting Office, 1994; GAO/Comptroller General of the United<br />

States, 1996; and the work of the National Performance Review 35 ).<br />

The then current approach to position management and recruitment in the IC was very<br />

much driven by the legacy systems and missions. Changing from these systems was difficult and<br />

faced significant organizational barriers. AIR implemented a pilot project at NSA to evaluate the<br />

possibility of transitioning one of their core business units to a more flexible process of<br />

describing their work and the skills necessary to achieve mission goals.<br />

AIR’s approach was based on the Occupational Information Network (O*NET). This<br />

system was based on the O*NET Occupational Information Network (Peterson, Mumford,<br />

Borman, Jeanneret, & Fleishman, 1999). The O*NET model evolved from a thorough review of<br />

previous work-related taxonomies, and represents state-of-the-art thinking about the world of<br />

work. Unlike many other models, it conceptualizes both the general and the specific aspects of<br />

the work domain in an integrated fashion and was thus ideally suited to NSA’s needs. For<br />

example, O*NET’s Basic and Cross-Functional Skill (BCFS) taxonomy was used to capture<br />

broad competencies that cut across NSA jobs, so that these jobs could be compared and grouped<br />

to create a skills-based occupational structure. Similarly, O*NET’s Generalized Work Activities<br />

(GWA) taxonomy was used to ensure homogeneity of work activities within each occupation.<br />

Finally, O*NET’s Occupational Skills taxonomy was used to characterize the specific<br />

requirements of particular NSA occupations.<br />

The O*NET approach was well received at NSA and the pilot program was expanded to<br />

include the entire agency. That is, AIR had the task of describing all work carried out at the<br />

agency in a skills-based taxonomy. This work, and its follow on activities for the agency,<br />

continues today.<br />

Other members of Community were impressed with the impact and flexibility of the<br />

occupational redesign at NSA. In 1998 NIMA adopted this approach This approach was<br />

35 Now the National Partnership for Reinventing Government. See<br />

http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/npr/library/review.html and http://www.nima.mil/ast/fm/acq/nima_commission.pdf<br />

449<br />

45 th Annual Conference of the <strong>International</strong> <strong>Military</strong> <strong>Testing</strong> <strong>Association</strong><br />

Pensacola, Florida, 3-6 November <strong>2003</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!