09.12.2012 Views

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

746<br />

FACTO ALPH<br />

DESCRIPTION MEA SD*<br />

R A<br />

N*<br />

Factor I .8829 Relationship with peers and superiors<br />

5.0879 1.26<br />

34<br />

Factor II .8896 Satisfaction with financial re-numeration<br />

3.6566 1.36<br />

28<br />

Factor III .8687 Career and personal development opportunities<br />

4.2537 1.25<br />

34<br />

Factor IV .8836 Perception and satisfaction with issues pertaining to<br />

promotions and advancements<br />

3.6719 1.25<br />

74<br />

Factor V .8813 Meaningfulness of and satisfaction with the job<br />

Factor VI .8876 Support provided by the organisation<br />

Factor<br />

VII<br />

Factor<br />

VIII<br />

.7720 Workload<br />

.7334 Comparisons with the Private Sector<br />

45 th Annual Conference of the <strong>International</strong> <strong>Military</strong> <strong>Testing</strong> <strong>Association</strong><br />

Pensacola, Florida, 3-6 November <strong>2003</strong><br />

5.2620 1.34<br />

25<br />

4.1999 1.53<br />

51<br />

4.9660 1.20<br />

22<br />

4.1574 1.25<br />

15<br />

* Factor scores were computed based on the arithmetic means of the items that loaded on the<br />

respective factor.<br />

Relationship Between Commitment & Work Variables<br />

The next step involved using Stepwise Multiple Regression to analyse the relationship<br />

between the work factors and each Organisational Commitment dimension. All the 8 work<br />

factors were regressed onto each of the Organisational Commitment dimension in turn. The<br />

order of the variables entered into the regression equation each time was determined by the<br />

strength of the correlation between each variable and the Organisational Commitment<br />

dimension concerned.<br />

‘Meaningfulness/Satisfaction with job’ and ‘Relationship with peers and superiors’<br />

were found to predict AC significantly, accounting for about 48% of the variance. On the<br />

other hand, only ‘Meaningfulness/Satisfaction with job’ predicted CC, accounting for only<br />

7% of the variance. There were 3 predictors of NC; ‘Meaningfulness/ satisfaction with the<br />

job’, ‘Promotion opportunities’ and ‘Support provided by the organisation’. Together, these<br />

accounted for almost 52% of the variance.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!