09.12.2012 Views

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

2003 IMTA Proceedings - International Military Testing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1998). For example, nearly all of the occupational reinforcers discussed in the TWA are socially<br />

desirable. Thus, a Likert-type work values measure is not likely to yield useful information. On<br />

the other hand, not all of the work activities, work contexts, leisure activities, or learning<br />

experiences used in vocational interest inventories are socially desirable. These differences<br />

indicate that the best methods for managing response distortion on these measures may differ<br />

depending on whether one is assessing work values or vocational interests.<br />

Work Values<br />

One promising way to deal with content that is socially desirable is to use a forced-choice<br />

format. For Select21, we constructed a novel forced-choice occupational reinforcer-based needs<br />

measure to assess work values. The purpose of using a forced-choice format was to reduce its<br />

susceptibility to response distortion in the operational selection context (Jackson, Wrobleski, &<br />

Ashton, 2000).<br />

However, the forced-choice format is not without its problems. For example, forcedchoice<br />

measures result in ipsative or partially ipsative data (Hicks, 1970). Ipsative data indicate<br />

whether an individual is higher on one construct than another (e.g., whether a prospective Soldier<br />

has a greater need for work autonomy than for a supportive supervisor). However, the selection<br />

context needs normative data that compare individuals to each other on a single construct (e.g.,<br />

orders prospective Soldiers on their need for work autonomy). We are taking several steps to<br />

help maximize the ability to normatively scale recruits based on their responses to our forcedchoice<br />

measure (see Van Iddekinge, Putka, & Sager, <strong>2003</strong>). Another potential problem that may<br />

arise from using a forced-choice format to assess work values is that one value in a pair sounds<br />

more like the Army than the other. In such cases, an applicant desiring to be selected into the<br />

Army may endorse that statement regardless of whether they value it. We took steps to construct<br />

the forced choice work values measure to make such impression management tactics more<br />

difficult (see Van Iddekinge et al., <strong>2003</strong>).<br />

Interests<br />

Unlike measures of work values, assessing applicants’ vocational interests with a forcedchoice<br />

measure may be less feasible. For example, on many interest measures, items relating to<br />

military-type activities (e.g., I like to shoot guns) are included as indicators of realistic interests.<br />

Inclusion of such items is problematic in a selection context. That is, an applicant who strongly<br />

desires to get into the Army and is willing to distort his/her responses to do so will indicate a<br />

strong liking for such items regardless of whether it interests him/her. Given the specific nature<br />

of common interest items, imposing a forced-choice format by pairing these items with other<br />

interest items would not likely resolve this type of response distortion.<br />

Another factor that limits the potential benefit of a forced-choice interest measure is the<br />

number of items often used to measure occupational interests. For example, a diverse array of<br />

work activities from different occupations may be required to accurately measure investigative<br />

interests. One drawback of this is that it makes it more difficult to use a forced-choice format<br />

495<br />

45 th Annual Conference of the <strong>International</strong> <strong>Military</strong> <strong>Testing</strong> <strong>Association</strong><br />

Pensacola, Florida, 3-6 November <strong>2003</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!