18.12.2012 Views

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC ACADEMY 7th JOINT - IOA

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC ACADEMY 7th JOINT - IOA

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC ACADEMY 7th JOINT - IOA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

trial in Athens and instead went to Athens’ great enemy Sparta, who<br />

gladly made use of his services during his stay.<br />

Tensions, however, came not only from individualistic ambition<br />

but also through the ways that a community acknowledged its<br />

Olympic victor. Leukas has already dealt with this issue in his paper,<br />

but I would reiterate that in extreme cases the state’s perceived failure<br />

to do honour to its Olympic victors, both alive and dead, could carry<br />

serious consequences and required significant undertakings by the<br />

community, such as the establishment of hero-cult. Of course there<br />

were less drastic, and for us more realistic, alternatives. A former<br />

Olympic victor might simply leave his home community and live<br />

elsewhere, and there is even the odd case where an athlete gifted his<br />

victory, much lie Cimon of Athens did, but to another community, for<br />

political purposes.<br />

Having said this, however, the polis did find ways to moderate the<br />

victor and to integrate the great man within the state. Alcibiades’<br />

victory reflected well on Athens. Indeed all victors bought glory to<br />

their city-state. The importance of an Olympic victory to the state<br />

ensured that a partnership was formed between an Olympic victor and<br />

his city-state. This new level of relationship was based on a flow of<br />

respective kudos in what one scholar has labelled “an economy of<br />

kudos.”<br />

For the victor, the flow of kudos began during the Games when,<br />

for example, his name, his city, and his event were announced before<br />

the assembled crowd and he received his olive crown. The victor<br />

could of course erect a statue at Olympia in the Altis to forever testify<br />

to his achievement. His home community, however, was expected to<br />

continue this flow of kudos. At home, an Olympic victor could<br />

perhaps expect to see his statue erected in a public space, as such<br />

reminders guaranteed the continuance of a victor’s kleos, his spoken<br />

fame. Later traditions held that it was customary for a community to<br />

throw down part of its walls for the victor’s entry into his home-city.<br />

At Athens, a victorious athlete could expect to be dined at public<br />

expense every day in the prytaneion in the city marketplace, the<br />

agora. Cities could also provide cash rewards in recognition of an<br />

Olympic victory, as Plutarch’s anachronistic attribution of such a<br />

measure to Solon, for example, indicates.<br />

- 224 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!