18.12.2012 Views

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC ACADEMY 7th JOINT - IOA

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC ACADEMY 7th JOINT - IOA

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC ACADEMY 7th JOINT - IOA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Scholars are divided in their assessments of the influence of<br />

television over the presentation of the Games and the communication<br />

of the ideals of Olympism. Unlike Brundage, Michael Payne,<br />

Marketing Director of the IOC, is effusive in his praise of the impact<br />

of television has had: “The growth in the prestige and standing of the<br />

Olympic Movement can be directly attributed to the development of<br />

television in the twentieth century … Television has been a great<br />

friend and ally of the Olympics” (Payne, 1996: 305). Kidd (1989,<br />

1992), too, has noted that television has served one of the aims of<br />

Olympism by bringing the Olympic Games to a far wider audience. “It<br />

has ensured ‘the widest possible audience’-one goal of the Olympic<br />

Charter-for the Games” (Kidd, 1989: 1-5).<br />

The potential negatives for the Olympic Movement associated<br />

with this relationship, however, are not lost on Kidd. He notes that he<br />

is “concerned about the domination and manipulation of Olympic<br />

meanings-values, received history, and significance of events-by the<br />

concentration of corporate interests which has come to be known as<br />

the ‘sports media complex’” (Kidd 1989: 1-6). Gruneau (1989a,<br />

1989b) suggests that sport telecasts are designed to present athletic<br />

contests in as dramatic a way as possible to accumulate audiences for<br />

advertisers, while at the same time “winning consent for a dominant<br />

social definition of sport ideally suited to a capitalist consumer<br />

culture” (Gruneau, 1989a: 152).<br />

Yet, this “sport-media complex” is not monolithic, and the<br />

complexity of international Olympic broadcasts challenges the notion<br />

that “one single ‘meaning’ were [sic] generated by the event” (Puijk,<br />

2000: 311). The meanings of Olympism become further contested in<br />

the interplay between host and local broadcasters. As Silk (2001) has<br />

observed-in the context of the 1998 Commonwealth Games-local<br />

broadcasters can use the host feed to serve their own national interests.<br />

Indeed, in their research on the 1992 Barcelona Games, Morgas Spà,<br />

Rivenburgh, and Larson found that<br />

… an alarming number of broadcast presentations of Olympic<br />

values were both narrow and sparse-and in a few broadcasts<br />

absent altogether…Of those values articulated by broadcasters<br />

those of participation and peace were most prevalent with<br />

international friendship following third. Beyond that, however,<br />

there was no sense of obligation displayed on the part of<br />

- 503 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!