18.12.2012 Views

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC ACADEMY 7th JOINT - IOA

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC ACADEMY 7th JOINT - IOA

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC ACADEMY 7th JOINT - IOA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1. Issues and Dimensions of Globalization<br />

Globalization is characterized as a set of dynamic<br />

interdependencies in the global scope, changing in time and spatial<br />

scope embracing multiple actors at the national, international,<br />

transnational and supra-national levels (see Held, 2002; Held et al,<br />

1999). As touched upon above, although there are differences between<br />

argument and approach to analyze globalization phenomena (see<br />

Appendix Table 1), most of the differences derive from the<br />

epistemological stance, where analysts dominantly give priority either<br />

to economics or cultural elements. Held et al (1999) and Cochrane and<br />

Pain (2000) divide schools of thought into three types: 1) globalists;<br />

2) skeptics; and 3) transformationalists. Whereas there are much more<br />

in-depth and varieties of argument within these categories, each<br />

approach emphasizes a certain element and practice of the dimension<br />

of ‘globalization’ that can capture the overall debate on globalization.<br />

The first account of the globalist or hyperglobalizer is to see<br />

globalization as a real and tangible phenomenon and as an inevitable<br />

path of development. Hyperglobalists argue that the development of<br />

capitalism and information and communication technology accelerate<br />

economic globalization, according to which international agencies,<br />

transnational private corporations and economic and financial players<br />

exercise influence on ‘national’ policies and policy-making practices<br />

that lead to the denationalization of economies in consequence the<br />

power of transnational corporations and international financial<br />

institutions increases at the expense of the regulatory and policymaking<br />

capacity of governments (see Fukuyama, 1992; Khor, 2001;<br />

Gray, 1998). In terms of cultural globalization, hyperglobalizers<br />

analyze the convergence of global culture and marginalization of<br />

nation-state influences identities, life-styles and the consumption<br />

behavior of people. The global diffusion and homogenization of<br />

national culture are represented by such keywords as<br />

‘Americanization’, ‘McDonalization’ or ‘Coca-colonization’. This<br />

uniformity of lifestyles and cultural symbols is marked by the<br />

modernizing force of American popular culture, Western<br />

consumerism or the mega-event of the Olympics or the soccer World<br />

Cup, where local cultures and national identities are replaced with the<br />

production and distribution of these forces (see Jameson, 1998).<br />

- 336 -<br />

Deleted:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!