18.12.2012 Views

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC ACADEMY 7th JOINT - IOA

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC ACADEMY 7th JOINT - IOA

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC ACADEMY 7th JOINT - IOA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

COURT ARBITRATION FOR SPORT:<br />

THE AD HOC DIVISION FOR THE <strong>OLYMPIC</strong> GAMES<br />

Mr Andreas ZAGKLIS (GRE)<br />

Introduction: The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS)<br />

Resolution of disputes arising in the context of organised sporting<br />

events is often a complicated and complex process. Achieving a<br />

balance between rapidly administering justice and adequately<br />

protecting the rights of participants is an issue ‘on trial’ here in the<br />

effort to protect the sporting event per se. Rapid resolution of sporting<br />

disputes is related directly to the problem-free conduct of sporting<br />

events while also ensuring that the sporting result is both reliable and<br />

valid.<br />

Such concerns have been touched upon in practice by the<br />

organisers of the largest modern sporting event, the Olympic Games.<br />

Two central characteristics of the Olympic Games are important for<br />

the purposes of the analysis attempted herein; that they are not<br />

conducted in any one place and that they are organised in the context<br />

of the Olympic movement where the ‘supreme authority’ 1 is a supranationally<br />

organised sporting association, the International Olympic<br />

Committee (IOC) 2 .<br />

The IOC systematically dealt with the issue before the 1996<br />

Summer Olympic Games, assigning responsibility 3 to a body, which<br />

had already begun to show signs of its effectiveness 4 , the Court of<br />

Arbitration for Sport (CAS) 5 . The CAS was established in 1983 by the<br />

International Olympic Committee in order to meet the need for an<br />

internationally recognised court for sport which could operate in a<br />

flexible manner. Although arbitration as an alternative form of sport<br />

dispute resolution is increasingly winning fans in the world of sport 6 , a<br />

fact of major historical importance for the development of the CAS<br />

was the effort to break away from the IOC and achieve its<br />

independence by modifying its Charter 7 . The CAS was thus able to<br />

provide impartial rulings in cases involving the IOC as a litigant<br />

itself 8 , opening the path for cases arising from or in relation to the<br />

Olympic Games, where the IOC was directly involved. The<br />

- 488 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!