18.12.2012 Views

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC ACADEMY 7th JOINT - IOA

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC ACADEMY 7th JOINT - IOA

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC ACADEMY 7th JOINT - IOA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The sheer number of gene transfer procedures making it to the<br />

clinical trial stage attests to the strong possibility that diseases like<br />

muscular dystrophy, certain cancers, arthritis, and so on will<br />

incorporate gene therapies into their standard treatments. Based on the<br />

past trends of performance-enhancing drugs and performanceenhancing<br />

measures, there will certainly be a subset within the group<br />

of all athletes that will want to undergo gene transfer procedures if<br />

they are convinced doing so will bring them one step closer to<br />

obtaining world records and Olympic gold medals. The accessibility<br />

that might arise when these procedures become available treatments<br />

for injured and diseased people could further their popularity as<br />

desirable options for athletes. Once the safety and efficacy of gene<br />

therapies is established, the attractiveness of these procedures to<br />

certain athletes will likely further increase. Adding to their desirability<br />

is the fact that regulated gene therapies will be safer than using<br />

unregulated substances like designer steroids or synthetic EPO<br />

because doctors and scientists will have researched, tested, and<br />

performed the procedures. The threat that gene therapies in the hands<br />

of the wrong people pose to the fight against doping in sport has been<br />

established. This makes gene doping a reality, not just a work of<br />

science fiction or a hypothetical situation with little chance of<br />

developing into a routine practice.<br />

Despite the perceived safety of gene transfer techniques, they<br />

evoke many ethical issues when used for the sake of gene doping.<br />

First, it is necessary to determine if using gene therapies to enhance<br />

athletic performance is morally acceptable or unacceptable in sport<br />

and to ascertain if the WADA’s ban on gene doping is ethical and in<br />

accordance with their position on doping in sport. When the WADA<br />

included gene doping on its list of Prohibited Classes and Methods as<br />

part of the World Anti-Doping Code on January 1, 2003, the agency<br />

took a proactive measure to eradicate gene doping in sport. In<br />

classifying gene doping, alongside oxygen transfers and chemical,<br />

pharmacological, and physical manipulations of samples, as a banned<br />

practice in sport, the WADA determined that it met at least two of the<br />

following three criteria: enhances performance, harms the athlete, or<br />

violates the spirit of sport (World Anti-Doping Code, 2003: p. 16).<br />

Which two of these three criteria gene doping meets is not explained<br />

and very few details are given to justify why it is banned. Included<br />

- 298 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!